Regional Court of Wiener Neustadt (Landesgericht Wiener Neustadt) (controller) – Dismissed (Austria, 2023)

Dismissed
Datenschutzbehörde12 June 2023Austria
final
Dismissed

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Austrian court dismissed a complaint from a person who wanted their financial information erased after the court did not respond to their request. The decision means that courts have special rules regarding data requests, which can limit individuals' rights to erase personal data. This ruling clarifies the boundaries of data protection in judicial matters.

What happened

A person requested the deletion of their financial asset information from a court but received no response.

Who was affected

The individual who filed the erasure request regarding their financial information.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the processing of data by courts is protected to ensure judicial independence, so the erasure request could not be fulfilled.

Why this matters

This case highlights that courts have specific protections under data laws, which can limit individuals' rights to access or erase their data. Businesses should be aware that judicial data processing is treated differently.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

View original scraped data
Art. 55(3) GDPR
Art. 77(1) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

CJEU 'Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens' (C-245/20) EU:C:2022:216
Source verified 9 July 2026
articles corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 03 May 2021, the data subject sent a request to the controller for the erasure of their financial asset information. The controller did not respond to their erasure request. On 17 July 2021, the data subject filed a complaint with the DPA (DSB) regarding the violation of their right to erasure under Article 17 GDPR. Over the course of the complaint proceedings, the controller refused the requested deletion. The DPA held that the European Union interprets the concept of data 'processing operations of courts acting in their judicial capacity', as defined in Article 55(3) GDPR, more broadly than under Austrian law. Referring to the decision of the [https://infocuria.curia.europa.eu/tabs/document/C/2020/C-0245-20-00000000RP-01-P-01/ARRET/256461-EN-1-html CJEU in 'Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens' (C-245/20) EU:C:2022:216], the supervision of processing operations carried out by courts 'acting in their judicial capacity' could directly or indirectly affect judicial independence or influence their decisions. As judicial activities must be exercised autonomously and free from any external influence, they are therefore excluded from that authority's competence. Individuals must have no reasonable doubt about the independence and impartiality of the justice system. As judges may have access to the information provided by the Austrian Justice System, processing that data may influence their performance of judicial tasks and the decision-making process. Therefore, the DPA dismissed the complaint, as it has no supervisory competence over the data processing operations of courts 'acting in their judicial capacity' pursuant to Article 55(3) GDPR.

Outcome

Dismissed

The complaint or investigation was dismissed.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Regional Court of Wiener Neustadt (Landesgericht Wiener Neustadt) (controller) in AT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

12 June 2023

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-10114

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Regional Court of Wiener Neustadt (Landesgericht Wiener Neustadt) (controller) - Austria (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: