City of Helsinki – Violation Found (Finland, 2023)

Violation Found
DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu2 August 2023Finland
final
Violation Found

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Finnish data protection authority found that the City of Helsinki failed to have a proper agreement with a company maintaining an online service for students. This is important because it shows that organizations must have clear contracts with service providers to protect personal data. Other public entities should ensure they have the right agreements in place.

What happened

The City of Helsinki did not have a data processing agreement with the company maintaining an online pupil welfare service.

Who was affected

Students who used the online service to contact school counselors or psychologists.

What the authority found

The authority ruled that the City of Helsinki violated GDPR by not having a required data processing agreement with the service provider.

Why this matters

This finding emphasizes the need for clear contracts with service providers to ensure data protection. Organizations should review their agreements to comply with data protection laws.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 28(3) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(b) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 28(3) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(b) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Source verified 19 March 2026
verified correct
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The Finnish DPA was notified that the City of Helsinki (the controller) had not concluded a data processing agreement with the company that maintained an online pupil welfare service that allowed pupils to contact a school counsellor or school psychologist. The DPA then asked the controller to explain who was responsible for maintaining the service. In response to the request, the controller clarified that it had no contractual documentation with the company maintaining the service regarding roles or data protection. The controller also stated that it no longer used the company to operate the service and that the service was now maintained by the controller. On the basis of the information provided by the controller, the DPA considered that another company had carried out the regular maintenance of the online service on behalf of the controller and had thus acted as a processor of personal data. The DPA found that, in the absence of a data processing agreement between the parties, the company maintaining the service was not contractually bound, for example, to ensure security of processing or confidentiality. On the basis of the information gathered, the DPA held that the controller had violated Article 28(3) GDPR by failing to comply with its obligation as controller to enter into a data processing agreement with the processor. As a result, the DPA issued a reprimand to the controller in accordance with Article 58(2)(b) GDPR.

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Details

Decision Date

2 August 2023

Authority

DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-7985

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. City of Helsinki - Finland (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: