City of Helsinki – Violation Found (Finland, 2023)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Finnish data protection authority found that the City of Helsinki failed to have a proper agreement with a company maintaining an online service for students. This is important because it shows that organizations must have clear contracts with service providers to protect personal data. Other public entities should ensure they have the right agreements in place.
What happened
The City of Helsinki did not have a data processing agreement with the company maintaining an online pupil welfare service.
Who was affected
Students who used the online service to contact school counselors or psychologists.
What the authority found
The authority ruled that the City of Helsinki violated GDPR by not having a required data processing agreement with the service provider.
Why this matters
This finding emphasizes the need for clear contracts with service providers to ensure data protection. Organizations should review their agreements to comply with data protection laws.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
The Finnish DPA was notified that the City of Helsinki (the controller) had not concluded a data processing agreement with the company that maintained an online pupil welfare service that allowed pupils to contact a school counsellor or school psychologist. The DPA then asked the controller to explain who was responsible for maintaining the service. In response to the request, the controller clarified that it had no contractual documentation with the company maintaining the service regarding roles or data protection. The controller also stated that it no longer used the company to operate the service and that the service was now maintained by the controller. On the basis of the information provided by the controller, the DPA considered that another company had carried out the regular maintenance of the online service on behalf of the controller and had thus acted as a processor of personal data. The DPA found that, in the absence of a data processing agreement between the parties, the company maintaining the service was not contractually bound, for example, to ensure security of processing or confidentiality. On the basis of the information gathered, the DPA held that the controller had violated Article 28(3) GDPR by failing to comply with its obligation as controller to enter into a data processing agreement with the processor. As a result, the DPA issued a reprimand to the controller in accordance with Article 58(2)(b) GDPR.
Outcome
Violation Found
The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.
Related Enforcement Actions (3)
Other enforcement actions involving City of Helsinki in FI
Violation Found
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. City of Helsinki - Finland (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: