Google LLC – Complaint Upheld (Greece, 2023)

Complaint Upheld
Hellenic Data Protection Authority29 June 2023Greece
final
Complaint Upheld

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Google had to delete certain links from its search results after a user requested to have them removed. The Greek DPA found that Google did not fully comply with the user's request for erasure. This case reinforces the right to be forgotten and the responsibilities of search engines.

What happened

Google was ordered to delete 9 links from its search results that were related to a user's name.

Who was affected

A user who requested the deletion of links that appeared in Google search results when searching for their name.

What the authority found

The Greek DPA ruled that Google must comply with the user's right to erasure unless it can prove a strong reason to keep the links.

Why this matters

This ruling underscores the importance of the right to be forgotten and sets a precedent for how search engines must handle deletion requests. Website operators should be aware of their obligations regarding user data.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 2(1) GDPR
Art. 3(2) GDPR
Art. 17(1) GDPR
Art. 21(1) GDPR
Art. 55(1) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(c) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 2(1) GDPR
Art. 3(2) GDPR
Art. 17(1) GDPR
Art. 21(1) GDPR
Art. 55(1) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(c) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Source verified 19 March 2026
articles corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A data subject filed a complaint with the Greek DPA (HDPA) on the grounds that Google LLC (the controller) did not satisfy his right to erasure, namely had not erased, as requested, 309 links with results relating to him, appearing on the Google search engine when searched by his name. Following subsequent communications of the HDPA and the parties involved, as well the HDPA’s own investigation, it was determined that the HDPA had yet to decide on 9 links for which the controller claimed that the data subject’s right to erasure was unfounded, and on further 4 links which were revealed after HDPA’s investigation. The HDPA ruled that the controller must comply with the right to be forgotten under Article 17 GDPR unless it can prove compelling legal grounds to retain the data and ordered the controller (per Art. 58(2) GDPR) to delete 9 links mentioned in the complaint and to confirm that links 1, 3, and 6–9 do not appear in Google search results when the data subject’s full name is used. The controller informed the HDPA that they are the respective controller for any data collected by the Google search engine. As the controller has no main EU establishment, the “one-stop-shop” mechanism under Articles 56 and 60 GDPR does not apply, making the HDPA competent under Articles 2(1), 3(2), and 55(1) GDPR. The HDPA also held that while not a public figure, the data subject’s professional activity places them in a role of public interest, as executives of significant companies may attract public interest.

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Details

Decision Date

29 June 2023

Authority

Hellenic Data Protection Authority

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-9728

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Google LLC - Greece (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: