ING Bank N.V. – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA RbAmsterdam7 July 2020Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled that ING Bank N.V. had a valid reason to keep a customer's personal data in its internal register for eight years. This decision is important because it shows that banks can protect their interests while handling personal data. Companies should ensure they have legitimate reasons for data retention.

What happened

The court upheld ING's decision to keep a customer's data in its Internal Referral Register for eight years.

Who was affected

A customer of ING Bank N.V. whose personal data was recorded in the bank's internal register.

What the authority found

The court found that ING had a legitimate interest in keeping the customer's data to protect the bank's integrity and security.

Why this matters

This case sets a precedent for how financial institutions can manage personal data while balancing their interests. Businesses should review their data retention policies to ensure compliance.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Decision AuthorityGHAMS
Reviewed AuthorityRb. Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Source verified 22 March 2026
verified correct
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Appellant is a customer of ING who had his personal data registered in ING's Internal Referral Register ("IVR") in 2013 for the period of 8 years. In 2017 appellant's credit card request was rejected by ING because of the record in IVR. Before 2013 the appellant had opened and closed 15 business accounts on behalf of different companies, two of which were closed with a negative balance. Appellant claims that ING has no legal basis for registering his personal data in the IVR. The Court upheld the decision of the Court of First instance: 1) registering appellant's personal data in the IVR was necessary to protect legitimate interest of ING and to protect integrity and security of the bank sector. The Court took into account ING's adherence to the Code of Conduct for the Processing of Personal Data by Financial Institutions ("Gedragscode Verwerking Persoonsgegevens Financiële Instellingen"); 2) IVR is an internal register of ING, appellant failed to demonstrate that the record in the IVR has prevented him from getting financial services at other institutions; 3) the fact that appellant was added to the register in 2013, but noticed this only in 2017 was quite significant, according to the Court. ING has added appellant's personal data to its internal register on good grounds and in compliance with the Code of Conduct and the GDPR.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

7 July 2020

Authority

DPA RbAmsterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. ING Bank N.V. - Netherlands (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: