VoetbalTV โ Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2020)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A Dutch court ruled that VoetbalTV could process personal data for broadcasting amateur football without a fine. The court disagreed with the Dutch DPA's strict view on what counts as a legitimate interest. This decision allows VoetbalTV to continue its activities without facing penalties.
What happened
VoetbalTV was initially fined for processing personal data without a valid lawful basis.
Who was affected
Amateur football players and viewers whose data was processed by VoetbalTV.
What the authority found
The court found that the Dutch DPA did not properly balance VoetbalTV's interests against the rights of individuals, leading to the annulment of the fine.
Why this matters
This ruling shows that courts can take a broader view on legitimate interests, which may help other companies understand their rights better. Businesses should consider how they balance their interests with user privacy.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
VoetbalTV, an initiative of the Royal Dutch Football Association (KNVB) and broadcasting company Talpa Network, is recording and broadcasting amateur football. The Dutch DPA fined VoetbalTV for processing personal data without a valid lawful basis. The Dutch DPA published guidance in which it states that a legitimate interest is only legitimate if it stems from a legal provision. Also, a purely commercial interest can never be a legitimate interest, according to the Dutch DPA. VoetbalTV appealed the decision. Does a legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR) need to stem from a legal provision and can a purely commercial interest result in a legitimate interest? The court does not agree with the restrictive interpretation of legitimate interest by the Dutch DPA. Any interest can be a legitimate interest as long as it is not against the law (negative test). The Dutch DPA should have performed a balancing test in order to balance the interests pursued by VoetbalTV against the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subjects. Because the DPA did not perform such a balancing test, the court annulled the decision and the imposed fine. The court annulled the decision and decided to judge the case itself (Article 8:72a Dutch General Administrative Law Act). Then the court decided to not take a new decision in order to replace the annulled decision, noting that the fine is now completely off the table.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (1)
Other cases involving VoetbalTV in NL
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. VoetbalTV - Netherlands (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: