Enforcing jurisdiction
Belgium · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit – Court Ruling (Belgium, 2021)

Court Ruling
Autorité de Protection des Données17 February 2021Belgium
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Several organizations filed complaints against the Interactive Advertising Bureau Europe for various GDPR violations, but they reached an agreement before the court made a decision. This matters because it shows that disputes can sometimes be resolved without a formal ruling.

What happened

Complaints against IAB Europe for GDPR violations were resolved through an agreement before a court ruling.

Who was affected

The complainants included individuals and NGOs concerned about data protection practices.

What the authority found

The Court of Appeal of Brussels noted that the parties reached an agreement, making further court proceedings unnecessary.

Why this matters

This case illustrates that parties can find common ground in data protection disputes, which may encourage more collaborative approaches in the future.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityCourt of Appeal of Brussels
Reviewed AuthorityAPD/GBA (Belgium)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The complainants, Johnny Ryan, Pierre Dewitte, Jeff Ausloos, Bruno Bidon, Panoptykon (NGO), Bits of Freedom (NGO) and La Ligue des Droits de l'Homme, filed several complaints against the Interactive Advertising Bureau Europe (IAB Europe) for various GDPR violations (including the principles of legality, transparency and fairness, minimisation and security among others). In total, 4 complaints were filed before the ADP and 5 before other data protection authorities through the IMI (Internal Market Information) system. These complaints were therefore joint into one investigation. An interlocutory decision, changing the language of the proceedings to French was made on 08/01/2021. Some parties did not agree with this and asked the Market Court to change the language to Dutch and to use full French text (some words where not in French). The parties reached an agreement before the Court of Appeal of Brussels (commercial section) had to render a judgement. The parties reached an agreement which made any interference from the Market Court obsolete.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit in BE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

17 February 2021

Authority

Autorité de Protection des Données

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit - Belgium (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: