Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DSB – Court Ruling (Austria, 2022)

Court Ruling
DPA BVwG29 April 2022Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Austrian court ruled in favor of DSB, a company that was accused of unlawfully surveilling its employees' work phones and emails. The court decided that the data protection authority did not have the power to declare the company's actions unlawful in this case. This ruling clarifies the limits of authority for data protection agencies in handling complaints.

What happened

The Austrian court ruled that DSB's surveillance of employee communications was not unlawful as claimed by the data protection authority.

Who was affected

The employees of DSB whose communications were monitored were affected.

What the authority found

The court found that the data protection authority lacked the legal basis to declare the company's processing of data unlawful.

Why this matters

This decision highlights the need for clear legal frameworks regarding employee monitoring and the powers of data protection authorities. Companies should ensure their practices comply with existing laws.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 58(2) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 58(2) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 24 DSG
Decision AuthorityBVwG

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller is an employer who allegedly surveilled its employees work phones and work email accounts from January until March 2021. The DSB (Austrian Data Protection Authority) heard of this conduct in media reports and initiated an ex officio investigation into the matter on 31 March 2021. On 29 July 2021 the DSB adopted an administrative act in which it declared the processing of the controller unlawful. The controller initiated court proceedings against the act claiming that its conduct was lawful and that the DSB - neither under national law nor under the GDPR - had the power to declare the processing unlawful. It argued that Article 58(2) GDPR does not provide a DPA with such a power, because "declaring the unlawfulness" is not listed there. Moreover, § 24 DSG (Austrian Data Protection Act) which provides the DPA with the power to make such a declaration only applies to proceedings which were initiated by a complaint and not by the DSB itself. The Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht – BVwG) decided in favour of the controller and set the administrative act aside. It found that there is no provision in national law or the GDPR that gave the DSB the power to declare the processing unlawful. The court first established that § 24 DSG, which provides the DSB with such a power, only applies to complaint proceedings and not ex officio proceedings. The court also rejected an analogous application of § 24 DSG, because it found that the legislator purposefully regulated complaint and ex officio proceedings differently so that there is no room for an analogous application. Moreover, it reasoned that in a complaint proceeding there is a data subject who may have a legal interest in the declaration in order to pursue further individual claims against the controller like a claim for damages; in ex officio proceedings no such interest exists. The court further found that there is no legal basis in the GDPR either, since Article 58(2) GDPR does not include a power to declare the processing unlawful, but only the power to issue a reprimand or to fine the controller.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

29 April 2022

Authority

DPA BVwG

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DSB - Austria (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: