Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Österreichische Post AG – Court Ruling (Austria, 2023)

Court Ruling
DPA OGH24 March 2023Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Austrian Supreme Court ruled that Österreichische Post AG did not violate a user's right to access their personal data. The court found that the company was allowed to provide only general categories of data recipients instead of specific names. This ruling clarifies how companies can respond to access requests under data protection laws.

What happened

Österreichische Post AG was found to have properly responded to a user's request for access to their personal data by providing broad categories of data recipients.

Who was affected

A user who requested access to their personal data held by Österreichische Post AG.

What the authority found

The court decided that the company was not required to disclose the specific identities of data recipients, only their general categories.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent for how companies can handle access requests, allowing them to provide less detailed information. It serves as guidance for other businesses on their obligations under data protection laws.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 15(1)(c) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 15(1)(c) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityOGH

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 22 March 2026.

No issues were reported by that automated check.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller was a logistics and postal service provider also active in the fields of direct marketing and address publication. The data subject requested the controller to provide access to personal data concerning them pursuant to Article 15 GDPR. Deeming the controller’s reply insufficient, the data subject went to court to enforce their right to access. The data subject asked a full disclosure of which data were effectively shared and with whom, as the controller’s reply did not comply with the principles of accuracy and comprehensibility under Article 12(1) GDPR. During the civil proceeding it became clear that the controller processed and shared with third-parties data concerning the data subject’s marketing profile and potential political affinities with third-parties. However, the controller did not disclose the identity of specific recipients in the access request, but only their broad categories (e.g. advertising companies, IT-companies, NGOs). The controller denied that statistical data about data subjects’ political and philosophical affinities (the so-called marketing profiles) were personal data covered by the GDPR. The controller also replied that it could not disclose recipients’ identity because of several reasons, such as business confidentiality and a disproportionate effort on its side, as it did not keep a record of all the disclosure operations. Also, the controller argued that there is no obligation to disclose the identity of specific recipients under the GDPR, but only the categories of recipients. The first instance court upheld the controller’s defense. The court of appeal confirmed this judgement, stating that the GDPR gives the controller a free choice whether to share specific recipients or broad categories of recipients. As the controller disclosed such categories during the first instance proceeding, Article 15 GDPR was not violated. The Austrian Supreme Court sent a preliminary reference to the CJEU, which decided the case with j

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

24 March 2023

Authority

DPA OGH

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Österreichische Post AG - Austria (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: