Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2023)

Court Ruling
DPA RbMidden-Nederland9 June 2023Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court ruled that the local data protection authority could not decide on a request related to journalists accessing court documents. This matters because it clarifies the limits of data protection authorities when it comes to judicial processes.

What happened

The Dutch DPA was found not competent to oversee the processing of personal data by the Council of State in its judicial capacity.

Who was affected

Individuals who requested the DPA to review the access of journalists to court documents containing personal data.

What the authority found

The court held that under GDPR, the DPA does not have the authority to supervise data processing related to judicial tasks.

Why this matters

This ruling establishes that judicial bodies have specific oversight for their data processing. It highlights the need for clear boundaries between data protection authorities and judicial functions.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

View original scraped data
Art. 55(3) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

Article 30b Wet op de Raad van State
Decision AuthorityRb. Midden-Nederland
Source verified 21 March 2026
verified correct
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject requested the Dutch DPA enforce the GDPR against the Council of State. In particular, the data subject asked the DPA to review whether giving journalists access to procedural documents was in accordance with the GDPR. The DPA declared itself not competent to decide on the processing operations undertaken by a court in its "judicial capacity". The data subject appealed this decision before the District Court Midden-Nederland. Among others, the data subject argued that if the DPA lacked competence to decide on their enforcement request, it should have forwarded it to an independent supervisory authority. The GDPR committee of the Council of State, mentioned by the DPA, did not qualify as independent. The court referred preliminary questions to the CJEU on the interpretation of 'judicial capacity' in the sense of Article 55(3) GDPR. The CJEU decided on 24 March 2022 (C-245/20) that it is part of a court's exercise of its "judicial tasks" within the meaning of Artilce 55(3) GDPR to temporarily provide journalists with documents containing personal data that originate from a judicial procedure, in order to enable them to report more effectively on the progress of that procedure. The Court implemented the CJEU decision and held that the DPA was right in declaring itself not competent. As a matter of fact, under Article 55(3) GDPR a DPA does not have the competence to oversee processings such as the ones at issue in the present case. The Court mentioned Recital 20 GDPR, which allows to specific bodies within the judicial organisation of each Member State to supervise data processing by courts and other judicial authorities. The Dutch legislator intentionally left the organisation of judicial supervision to the judiciary itself. The Council of State created a specific GDPR committee to handle such supervision. The committee is competent to overview processing operations undertaken within the Council of State's judicial tasks, according to GDPR in Article

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (10)

Other cases involving Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens in NL

Current
Jun 2023

Court Ruling

Details

Ruling Date

9 June 2023

Authority

DPA RbMidden-Nederland

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens - Netherlands (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: