Google LLC – Court Ruling (Finland, 2021)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Finnish Administrative Court ruled that Google must remove outdated search links that could mislead readers about a person's past. Google argued that these links were important for freedom of expression, but the court found that the person's privacy was more important in this case. This ruling shows that even big companies like Google must respect individuals' privacy rights.
What happened
Google was ordered to remove outdated search result links that could mislead the public about a person's current status.
Who was affected
The individual whose past was referenced in the outdated search results.
What the authority found
The court held that Google had to respect the individual's right to privacy over the company's interest in keeping the links available.
Why this matters
This decision sets a precedent that even public figures have a right to privacy, reminding companies to balance public interest with individual rights.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
Google LLC (the controller) had asked the Administrative Court of Helsinki to overturn [https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Tietosuojavaltuutetun_toimisto_(Finland)_-_918/154/2019 the Finnish DPA's decision], according to which the controller had been ordered to remove outdated search result links from Google Search. The controller filed the appeal claiming that the search results were necessary for exercising the right of freedom of expression and information within the meaning of Article 17(3)(a) GDPR. The controller also stated that there were compelling legitimate grounds to keep the search result links available to the public under Article 21(1) GDPR, as the data subject acted in a public role. The DPA argued that the date indicated in the news articles to which the search result links led did not guarantee that the reader understood the information as describing past events. Thus, a reader who ignored the date of the news article could think that the police was still seeking information about the data subject's whereabouts. The Court found that the controller processed the personal data for the purposes of its legitimate interests in accordance with Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. Therefore, the data subject must be considered to have objected to the processing of their personal data on grounds relating to their particular situation in accordance with Article 21(1) GDPR. In this respect, the Court considered that the data subject could be considered to have a public role in terms of balancing the interests between the right to privacy and freedom of expression due to the commission of a serious crime. The data subject could also be considered to have a public role as CEO and board member of a real estate agency. The Court noted that the news articles to which the search result links led indicated the date on which the news had been published. Thus, the fact that the general public might mistakenly believe that the arrest warrant against the data subject was still valid
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (2)
Other cases involving Google LLC in FI
Court Ruling
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Google LLC - Finland (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: