Meta Platforms Ireland Limited – Court Ruling (Germany, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA OLGKln23 May 2025Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A German court ruled that Meta can use public profile data to train its AI, as long as users don't object. This decision is significant because it allows Meta to continue its practices without needing explicit consent from users.

What happened

Meta announced it would use personal data from public profiles for AI training, which led to a legal challenge.

Who was affected

Users whose public profile data is utilized by Meta for AI training were affected by this decision.

What the authority found

The court held that Meta's processing of public profile data is lawful under GDPR, as it serves a legitimate interest.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent for how companies can use public data, suggesting that user consent may not always be necessary. Website operators should be aware of how they handle user data and the potential implications for their practices.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Decision AuthorityOLG Köln
Source verified 19 March 2026
articles corrected
authority corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

In April 2025, Meta Platforms Ireland Limited (Meta) publicly announced that it would use personal data from its users' public profiles to train artificial intelligence from 27 May 2025, unless users object to this processing. In May 2025, the German Consumer Rights Organisation "Verbraucherzentrale NRW" (plaintiff) brought an interim injunction case against Meta before the High Regional Court of Cologne, to prevent the processing of publicly provided user data. Following a preliminary and summary examination, as part of the interim proceeding, the High Regional Court of Cologne held that Meta did not breach the GDPR or the DMA, noting that this assessment is consistent with the regulatory assessment by the Irish DPA responsible for Meta. The Hamburg DPA (Hamburg Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information) stated at the hearing that the use of user's personal data for AI training purposes is legally possible. The court held that the processing is lawful within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, even without the data subjects' consent, and that Meta pursues a legitimate interest by using the data for the training of artificial intelligence systems. He further pointed that the fact that large amounts of data, also from third parties including minors and sensitive data within the meaning of Article 9 GDPR, are processed, does not outweigh this consideration. The High Regional Court of Cologne rejected the interim measure.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

23 May 2025

Authority

DPA OLGKln

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Meta Platforms Ireland Limited - Germany (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: