European Commission – CJEU Judgment (European Union, 2001)
CJEU precedent (Directive 95/46/EC, pre-GDPR)
This is a Court of Justice judgment predating the GDPR. It interprets Directive 95/46/EC (the Data Protection Directive). It is not a cookie or ePrivacy case and is excluded from cookie statistics and the Risk Calculator.
The Court of Justice ruled that Luxembourg did not properly implement data protection laws required by the EU. This matters because it shows that countries must follow EU rules on data protection. If they don't, they can face legal action from the European Commission.
What happened
The Court found that Luxembourg failed to implement Directive 95/46/EC within the required time frame.
Who was affected
The people of Luxembourg who rely on data protection laws were affected.
What the authority found
The Court held that Luxembourg did not fulfill its obligations under Article 32 of the Data Protection Directive.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes the importance of timely compliance with EU directives. It serves as a reminder for all EU countries to prioritize data protection laws.
On the 7th December 2000, the European Commission brought an action before the Court of Justice seeking a declaration that Luxembourg had failed to implement Directive 95/46/EC (the Data Protection Directive, herein “the Directive”), and in doing so, had violated Article 32 of the Directive. Article 32(1) of the Directive required Member States to implement any local laws, regulations and administrative necessary to transpose the Directive within three years following the adoption of the Directive, and to notify the Commission of same. On 26th August 1999, the Commission issued a reasoned opinion to Luxembourg requesting that they adopt the measures necessary to transpose the Directive within two months. Luxembourg responded at the end of the stated period, stating that a preliminary draft law had been prepared for submission to the legislature and that the delay was attributable to the change in government which had occurred in that year. The Court referred to Luxembourg’s explanation for the delay, and referenced the previous decision in C-4707/98 Commission v Greece [2000]. In the Greece decision, the Court found that provisions, practices and circumstances existing in the domestic legal system of a Member State may not be successfully relied up to justify a failure to comply with obligations laid down in a Directive. The Court applied the dicta in Greece and accordingly found that Luxembourg had failed to fulfil their obligations under Article 32 of the Directive.
Outcome
CJEU Judgment
A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union, typically on a preliminary reference from a national court.
Related Cases (2)
Other cases involving European Commission in EU
CJEU Judgment
Details
Judgment Date
4 October 2001
Authority
Court of Justice of the European Union
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-cjeu-9006About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. European Commission - European Union (2001). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: