- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Finland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Magazine publisher – €8,500 Fine (Finland, 2021)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A magazine publisher in Finland was fined €8,500 for making unsolicited marketing calls without proper consent. This matters because it shows that companies must get clear permission before contacting people for marketing. It highlights the importance of following GDPR rules about consent.
What happened
The magazine publisher conducted direct marketing calls using an automated system without valid consent from recipients.
Who was affected
People who received unsolicited marketing calls from the magazine publisher were affected.
What the authority found
The Finnish DPA found that the magazine publisher did not obtain proper consent for direct marketing, violating GDPR requirements.
Why this matters
This case emphasizes that companies must ensure they have valid consent for marketing activities. It serves as a reminder for businesses to review their consent processes to avoid similar penalties.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 14 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The Finnish DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 8,500 on a magazine publisher. The DPA received four complaints against the magazine publisher for unsolicited telephone advertising.The controller had carried out direct marketing using an automated calling system, without valid consent from the recipients of the calls. Specifically, the controller had obtained the apparent consent for direct marketing when a customer subscribed to a magazine on its website, for example. The subscriber to the magazine was required to accept the terms of the subscription and contract, which included consent to direct marketing. If the consent to direct marketing was not given, the magazine could not be subscribed. The DPA states that the consent and the way it was obtained did not comply with the GDPR. Indeed, the consent was not specifically requested for direct marketing and the consent collected together with the subscription and contract terms did not constitute voluntary consent for the purpose of direct marketing. In addition, it was not possible for data subjects to exercise their right to object due to the fact that the direct marketing calls were made using automated calling systems and the voice bots could not understand specific questions from data subjects about their data. Furthermore, the magazine publisher had commissioned a call center to carry out the advertising campaign and had not regulated its processing activities in a contract on commissioned processing.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for Magazine publisher in FI
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Fine Date
24 June 2021
Authority
Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto
Fine Amount
€8,500
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Magazine publisher - Finland (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: