- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Luxembourg · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Unknown – €7,200 Fine (Luxembourg, 2021)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A company in Luxembourg was fined €7,200 for using a video surveillance system that captured areas where employees worked and smoked. The data protection authority found this was unnecessary and violated rules about collecting only the data needed. This case highlights the importance of limiting data collection to what is truly necessary.
What happened
The company installed a video surveillance system that recorded employee work areas and smoking areas without justification.
Who was affected
Employees whose work areas and smoking areas were recorded by the company's surveillance cameras.
What the authority found
The authority ruled that the company violated data minimization principles by collecting more data than necessary.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes that companies must carefully consider what data they collect and ensure it is necessary for their stated purposes. Businesses should review their surveillance practices to avoid similar penalties.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 14 March 2026.
No issues were reported by that automated check.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The DPA from Luxembourg (CNPD) has imposed a fine of EUR 7,200 on a company. The company had installed a video surveillance system to protect the company's assets, prevent intrusion by unauthorized persons and prevent accidents. However, the cameras also captured parts of an employee's work area and the smoking area that employees frequently used. Furthermore, the controller had installed location sensors on the cars in its fleet. This was intended to optimize the company's operations. The DPA finds that the recording of employees was not necessary to ensure the purposes associated with the video surveillance and was therefore disproportionate. The DPA states that the controller thus violated the principle of data minimization under Article 5 (1) c) of the GDPR. The location data collected by the controller was stored for a period of eight months, although this would not have been necessary for the purposes of the processing. The DPA considered this to be a violation of the principle of data retention. Furthermore, the DPA found a violation of the information obligations set out in Art. 13 GDPR. Finally, the DPA found a violation of Art. 32 (1) GDPR. All persons who had authorized access to the software via which the locations could be tracked used the same account and not an individual account.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for Unknown in LU
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Fine Date
11 June 2021
Authority
Commission Nationale pour la Protection des Données
Fine Amount
€7,200
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Unknown - Luxembourg (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: