Telenet – Complaint Upheld (Belgium, 2021)

Complaint Upheld
Autorité de Protection des Données12 February 2021Belgium
final
Complaint Upheld

Belgium's data protection authority upheld a complaint against Telenet for making it hard for users to opt-out of direct marketing. The telecom company used confusing information and default settings that favored tracking. This ruling shows that companies must make it easy for users to manage their privacy choices.

What happened

Telenet made it difficult for users to opt-out of direct marketing and did not provide clear information about their rights.

Who was affected

Users of Telenet's services who wanted to opt-out of marketing communications.

What the authority found

The authority ruled that Telenet's practices violated GDPR's requirements for clear and accessible information about user rights.

Why this matters

This decision underscores the need for transparency in privacy policies. Website operators should simplify consent processes and ensure users can easily exercise their rights.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 14(GDPR)
Art. 7(3) GDPR
Art. 12(1) GDPR
Art. 12(2) GDPR
Art. 21(2) GDPR
Art. 4(11) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 14(GDPR)
Art. 21(2) GDPR
Art. 32(GDPR)
Art. 7(3) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Source verified 10 April 2026
articles corrected
verified correct
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The complainant states that finding how to exercise their right to opt-out of receiving direct marketing on the website of the telecom provider (Telenet) is very difficult. Sending a request for further information also led to no solution. The DPA's inspection states the following: 1. The use of a large number of documents, which makes the provision of information complex, unclear and difficult to understand; 2. The presence of erroneous information; 3. The use of techniques that may have an impact on the choices of the data subject including the granting of free consent and whether or not to become acquainted with the information or the exercise of rights; 4. The construction of the information in the form of a maze in which the data subject cannot easily access the information; 5. The default choices set by Telenet that are not the most privacy friendly and always allow profiling; 6. The mandatory quasi-automatic acceptance of communication of data via cookies; 7. Combined with the lack of possibility to easily way to exercise the right to object. How clear and transparent must a privacy policy be in order to satisfy the requirements of Article 13 GDPR and Article 13 GDPR? Does continuing to use a website constitutes consent to cookies? = The DPA states that the right to opt-out of direct marketing is absolute. To opt-out for Telenet's services, the opt-out must be sent through every channel of direct marketing communication or, to disable all at once, contact Telenet or go to a physical shop. The DPA finds that the medium of communication made available for exercising the right to object must be proportionate to the means by which the controller communicates with the data subject: if the controller communicates the mandatory information under Article 13 GDPR and Article 14 GDPR via its website and/or if the data subject receives digital marketing messages from the controller, then the right to object must also be capable of being expressed online. The DPA

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Violations (7)

No Reject Button
critical

Cookie banner does not provide a clear reject/refuse all button at the same level as the accept button.

Art. 7 GDPR

Reject Harder Than Accept
critical

Refusing cookies requires more clicks or steps than accepting them, or the reject option is less visually prominent.

Art. 7 GDPR

Pre-ticked Consent Boxes
high

Cookie consent checkboxes are pre-selected by default, violating the requirement for active, affirmative consent.

Art. 4(11) GDPR

Unclear Cookie Information
high

The cookie banner or cookie policy provides vague, incomplete, or unclear information about what cookies are used and why.

Art. 12, 13 GDPR

Misleading Banner Messaging
critical

The cookie banner uses misleading language to trick or pressure users into accepting cookies (dark patterns).

Art. 7 GDPR

No Granular Cookie Choice
high

Users cannot select or deselect individual cookie categories; consent is presented as all-or-nothing.

Art. 4(11) GDPR

Cannot Withdraw Cookie Consent
critical

No accessible mechanism exists for users to withdraw previously given cookie consent.

Art. 7(3) GDPR

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Telenet in BE

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Similar Cases

Enforcement actions with similar violations

Details

Decision Date

12 February 2021

Authority

Autorité de Protection des Données

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-3155

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified
Cookie relevance: 80%

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Telenet - Belgium (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: