Enforcing jurisdiction
Denmark · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Alstrøm – Din Isenkræmmer ApS – Complaint Upheld (Denmark, 2021)

Complaint Upheld
Datatilsynet (Denmark)20 October 2021Denmark
final
ePrivacy
Complaint Upheld

Denmark's Data Protection Authority found that Alstrøm's cookie consent methods were misleading and did not provide users with a real choice. The company initially made it difficult for users to reject cookies, which is against data protection rules. This ruling serves as a warning for businesses to ensure their consent mechanisms are clear and fair.

What happened

Alstrøm's website used misleading cookie consent banners that made it easier for users to accept cookies than to reject them.

Who was affected

Website visitors who encountered Alstrøm's cookie consent banners.

What the authority found

The DPA determined that Alstrøm did not obtain valid consent for cookie use because users were not given a genuine option to reject cookies.

Why this matters

This ruling stresses the importance of transparent and user-friendly cookie consent mechanisms. Website operators should ensure that users can easily opt out of cookie tracking.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 4(11) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(11) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 10 April 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A data subject filed a complaint with the Danish DPA regarding the controller's use of cookies on their website. The controller had relied on consent as a legal basis. The controller had first requested consent through a pop up box stating that the website used cookies. The pop up box contained two hyperlinks labeled "Read more about cookies" and "Close". During the DPA's investigation, the controller had introduced a new method of requesting consent. The controller's second solution included more information about the processing, as well as the option to opt out of processing for specific purposes from a list. With the new solution, the user had the choice between two hyperlinks labeled "ACCEPT ALL" and "Accept". The Danish DPA assessed both the first and the second consent request solution. = The DPA held that the controller could not obtained a valid consent under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR for the use of cookies when the first solution was used. The data subject did not have the option to consent to processing for particular purposes. More importantly, the controller offered no opt-out solution for the use of cookies. The data subject therefore had no choice in the matter when visiting the website. As a consequence, the DPA expressed severe criticism about the processing activities based on this cookie banner. = The DPA then had to assess whether the changes made to the cookie banner were sufficient to obtain the valid consent of data subjects. The DPA held that although the data subjects now had the possibility to reject all cookies, the cookie banner had been designed in a way that nudged the data subject towards clicking on the "ACCEPT ALL" button. It was easier for the data subjects to consent to the use of cookies than to reject such use. The DPA therefore also expressed criticism about the second solution. Lastly, the DPA also criticized the processing activities after the second solution was implemented because the cookie tracking actually began before obtaining the data subject's consent (i.e. before the data subject even clicked on the "Accept" or "ACCEPT ALL" button).

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Alstrøm – Din Isenkræmmer ApS in DK

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

20 October 2021

Authority

Datatilsynet (Denmark)

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-4274

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Alstrøm – Din Isenkræmmer ApS - Denmark (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: