The State of the Netherlands – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA RbRotterdam21 January 2020Netherlands
final
ePrivacy
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court ruled on a case involving access to personal data held by the State of the Netherlands. This decision is important because it clarifies how people can access their own information, even if it doesn't involve cookies or consent. It emphasizes the right to know what personal data is being processed.

What happened

The court addressed a case about access to procedural files and personal data.

Who was affected

Individuals seeking access to their personal data held by the State of the Netherlands.

What the authority found

The court found that the State of the Netherlands had complied with the requirements for providing access to personal data under GDPR.

Why this matters

This ruling reinforces the importance of transparency in data processing. It reminds companies that individuals have a right to access their personal information, which can help build trust.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

Article 12 Code of Civil Procedure
Decision AuthorityRechtbank Rotterdam
Source verified 14 April 2026
articles corrected
national law identified
authority corrected
scope corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The plaintiff asked to the State to grant him access to procedural files in which he was involved against the State of the Netherlands concerning forgeries offence. The applicant claimed that the procedural files contained his personal data and evidences which could help him to prove his innocence in the aforementioned case and all the cases in which he would have been involved as party against the State. The State refused to grant him the access. The Court clarified the interplay between the right to inspection under the ePrivacy Directive and the right to access under the GDPR. First, the Court examines the basis of the applicant's request pursuant to Article 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure which requires to state fully and truthfully the relevant facts, and to submit all the document relevant to the application. In this regard, the Court considered that the applicant did not comply with this obligation. Indeed, the Court pointed out there is no docuiment showing that the applicant submitted an inspection request of the procedural files at stake. Then, the Court clarified that both the ePrivacy Directive and the GDPR apply. It considered that the right of inspection of document including personal data is not absolute. However, it stated that the access right and the right of inspection have to be understood as a right to a complete overview of all personal data, in a form that enables the data subject to inspect his or her data and to check that they are correct and have been processed lawfully. Regarding the format, the Court recalled that the data subject cannot expect to be provided with the original document and that the material form depends on the concrete circumstances. Finally, the Court considered that in any cae, the applicant's purpose was not to verify the accuracy and lawfulness of the personal data processed but to use them to prove his innocence in the case he was involved against the State and in any proceedings to be brought against the S

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for The State of the Netherlands in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

21 January 2020

Authority

DPA RbRotterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. The State of the Netherlands - Netherlands (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: