Tina Turner – Court Ruling (Germany, 2022)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
Tina Turner lost a legal battle against a tribute show that used her name and image without her permission. This ruling is significant because it highlights the balance between artistic expression and personal rights. Artists and performers should be aware of their rights regarding the use of their likeness in promotional materials.
What happened
Tina Turner sued the organizers of a tribute show for using her likeness in advertising without her consent.
Who was affected
Tina Turner was directly affected by the use of her name and image in the tribute show.
What the authority found
The court ruled that the artistic rights of the show organizers outweighed Turner's personal rights in this case.
Why this matters
This case underscores the importance of understanding the legal boundaries between personal rights and artistic freedom, especially for those in creative industries.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
National Law Articles
Tina Turner sued the organiser of a tribute show called "Simply The Best - Die Tina Turner Story" for injunctive relief. In her opinion, the photo and the name of the show gave the impression that she would be standing on stage in person or supporting the show. The question was whether the double looked too much like the original and whether advertising posters with her photo and the title "Simply The Best - The Tina Turner Story" gave the impression that the superstar herself was involved. In the first instance, the Regional Court of Cologne (LG Köln) held that the personality rights of Ms. Turner outweighed the artistic rights of the organiser. The Higher Regional Court of Cologne (OLG Köln) overturned this decision and held that the artistic freedom (Kunstfreiheit) outweighed the personality rights of Ms. Turner, who appealed against this ruling. The German Federal Court of Justice held that a claim for injunctive relief with regard to the use of Ms. Turner's likeness is not applicable on the grounds of the German Civil Code in conjunction with §§ 22, 23 KUG (Art Copyright Act). While the Court agreed with the previous instances that the pictures of the plaintiff constituted personal data pursuant to Article 4(1) GDPR, it based its decision on §§ 22, 23 KUG. Under the KUG, it is permissible to take and publish photos of people without their consent if it is in the "higher interest of Art", i.e. if the artistic value of such creation outweighs the personal rights of the person pictured. However, the Court did not decide on the relationship between the KUG and the GDPR. It rather left open the question whether the use of the plaintiff's image for the defendant's posters was for "artistic purposes" within the meaning of Article 85(1) and (2) GDPR and whether the conditions set out therein for the adoption or continued application of national provisions (i.e. the KUG) were fulfilled with regard to the constellation of the case in dispute. The Court merely held
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Tina Turner in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Tina Turner - Germany (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: