Court case 15 O 74/22 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2023)

Court Ruling
DPA LGLbeck25 May 2023Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A German court ruled that Facebook's default privacy settings allowed third parties to link phone numbers to user profiles, leading to a major data breach affecting 533 million people. This case highlights the importance of strong privacy protections and user control over personal data. Facebook's lack of security measures made it easy for hackers to scrape user data, which is a serious concern for anyone using online services.

What happened

Facebook's default privacy settings allowed third parties to match phone numbers with user profiles, resulting in a data breach.

Who was affected

Facebook users whose phone numbers were linked to their profiles without their consent.

What the authority found

The court found that Facebook's privacy settings violated principles of privacy by design and default, leading to a significant data breach.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes that companies must prioritize user privacy and security. It serves as a warning for businesses to ensure their privacy settings are user-friendly and secure.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 82(GDPR)
View original scraped data
Art. 82(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityLG Lübeck

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 12 April 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, amount discrepancy, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject was a Facebook user. According to the privacy settings selected at the moment of the facts, their phone number could be used by a third person to find the data subject’s profile on Facebook, even if the phone number itself was not public. Accordingly, information relating to the data subject could be linked to their phone number by anyone in possession of such a number. In 2019, unknown “third parties” automatically combined telephone numbers and matched them with Facebook profiles thanks to the above-mentioned function. In this way, telephone numbers could be assigned to identified users. This resulted in a data breach concerning 533 million people in 106 different countries. According to the data subject, Facebook violated the principles of “privacy by design” and “privacy by default”. They lamented that the settings just described were Facebook default settings and they could be changed only through a complex procedure. These default settings, alongside wiht the total lack of security measures by Facebook, made data scraping possible. The data subject lamented that since the data breach they received phishing emails and calls. In light of the loss of control over their personal data, the data subject claimed damages for €1,000 under Article 82 GDPR. Facebook replied that it was up to the data subject to change their privacy settings. Moreover, and despite Facebook’s subsequent attempts to prevent and mitigate risks, no measure could entirely protect users from scraping. The Regional Court of Lübeck (Landgericht Lübeck) upheld the data subject claim for damages and granted €500 of compensation. According to the court, the processing was neither based on consent (Article 6(1)(a) GDPR), nor contract (Article 6(1)(b) GDPR), nor legitimate interest of the controller (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR). With specific regard to consent, the court found that it was not informed informed within the meaning of Article 4(11) GDPR. Indeed, finding information about the

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 15 O 74/22 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

25 May 2023

Authority

DPA LGLbeck

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 15 O 74/22 - Germany (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: