WetterOnline Meteorologische Services GmbH – Court Ruling (Germany, 2024)
WetterOnline Meteorologische Services GmbH faced a court ruling regarding its cookie consent practices on its website. The court found that the company did not provide a clear option for users to reject cookies, which is required under GDPR. This ruling is significant because it emphasizes the need for transparent and user-friendly consent mechanisms for online tracking.
What happened
WetterOnline's cookie banner did not allow users to easily reject non-essential cookies.
Who was affected
Website visitors who encountered the cookie banner on WetterOnline were affected.
What the authority found
The court ruled that WetterOnline's cookie consent mechanism violated GDPR requirements by lacking a clear reject option.
Why this matters
This ruling highlights the importance of designing cookie consent banners that are easy for users to understand. Website operators should ensure their consent practices comply with data protection laws to avoid legal issues.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
National Law Articles
The North Rhine Westphalia Consumer Protection Association ([https://www.verbraucherzentrale.nrw/ Verbraucherzentrale NRW]) claimed for an injunction against the use of cookie banners on [https://www.wetteronline.de/ wetteronline.de], a wesite operated by WetterOnline Meteorologische Services GmbH, the controller. The controller used a cookie banner to collect users' consent to not necessary cookies without providing a reject option on the first layer. The data subject could only refuse to give consent by clicking on the “Settings” button to reach the second layer, where they then had an “Accept all” button or a “Save” button. The cookie banner also had an “Accept & Close X” button in the top-right corner, on both first and second level. In a judgement dated 4 May 2023, the Regional Court of Cologne (Landgericht Köln, LG Köln) dismissed the action as it considered the claim of the Association to be too broad and claimed that it could not impose a specific cookie banner design on the controller. The Association appealed against this judgement to the Higher Regional Court of Cologne (Oberlandesgericht Köln, OLG Köln) and specified its claim. Firstly, the OLG Köln considered that the controller designed their cookie banner without an equivalent "reject option" either at the first or second layer. The OLG pointed out that the average user does not realise what the “Save” button represents - namely refusal to provide consent for the use of not necessary cookies. Therefore, the OLG decided that consent could not be regarded as freely given and sufficiently informed under Article 4(11) GDPR. Secondly, regarding the “Accept & Close X” button, the OLG considered that the “X” symbol is known to users as a way to close a window, but not to consent to the use of cookies. The average user would not be aware that this constitutes consent, even if the “Accept & Close” is located directly next to the “X” symbol. The OLG also noted that it was not easy for data subjects to recog
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Violations (3)
Cookie banner does not provide a clear reject/refuse all button at the same level as the accept button.
Art. 7 GDPR
Refusing cookies requires more clicks or steps than accepting them, or the reject option is less visually prominent.
Art. 7 GDPR
Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for WetterOnline Meteorologische Services GmbH in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. WetterOnline Meteorologische Services GmbH - Germany (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: