Microsoft Corporation – Court Ruling (Germany, 2024)
Microsoft faced a court ruling after a user claimed its cookies were placed on her device without consent. The court dismissed the case, stating the user could block cookies through browser settings. This is significant because it shows that users have control over cookie settings, but companies must still be careful about how they implement tracking.
What happened
A user claimed Microsoft placed cookies on her device without her consent.
Who was affected
The user who alleged that Microsoft’s cookies were placed without consent.
What the authority found
The court dismissed the case, stating the user could manage cookie settings through her browser.
Why this matters
This ruling highlights the balance of interests between users and companies. Website operators should ensure they provide clear options for users to manage cookies.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 12 April 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The controller, Microsoft Corporation, provides the service “Microsoft advertising” which enables website operations to place adverts in the search results of the "Microsoft Search Network". It can also collect information about the visitors to a website and to place targeted adverts for these visitors via cookies. The data subject visited third-party websites. She claims that the controller’s cookies were placed on her device without her consent. A forensic analysis of the recorded network traffic revealed that cookies from the controller had been placed on the data subject’s device without their consent. The data subjected sought injunctive relief at the Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main (“Landgericht Frankfurt am Main”) and requested the court to order the controller to refrain from using cookies on her end devices without her consent. The court refused to issue an interim injunction and dismissed the case. The court stated that grounds for an injunction were lacking and that the data subject did not demonstrate that they would otherwise suffer considerable disadvantages and that they cannot reasonably be expected to wait for the main proceedings. The court held that the data subject had the option to block the storage or reading of cookies via the internet browser settings, while the controller would have to change its complete processing, costing enormous effort in terms of time and money. Thus, the balance of interests is therefore in favour of the controller. The data subject appealed this decision at the higher regional court of Frankfurt (“Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main”), arguing that the balance of interests is in their favour as there can be no right to exercise an unlawful business model. Moreover, the data subject had to live with the uncertainty of the whereabouts of its data, the associated loss of control and the fear of disclosure to unauthorised third parties. The data subject requested the court to amend the first judgement, to grant the i
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Violations (2)
Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Third-party tracking cookies or scripts are loaded without obtaining prior user consent.
Art. 13, 14 GDPR
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Microsoft Corporation in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Microsoft Corporation - Germany (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: