CJEU case C‑178/22 Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bolzano – CJEU Judgment (European Union, 2024)
The Court of Justice ruled on a case involving the Italian Public Prosecutor's office that sought to access phone records during a theft investigation. This decision clarifies the balance between privacy rights and law enforcement needs in data access cases.
What happened
The Italian Public Prosecutor's office requested access to telephone records from telecom companies to investigate mobile thefts.
Who was affected
Users of the stolen mobile phones, whose data was requested, were affected by this case.
What the authority found
The Court held that the requests for data must comply with privacy regulations and that the necessity of data access must be carefully evaluated.
Why this matters
This ruling highlights the need for law enforcement to respect privacy rights when accessing personal data, reinforcing the importance of legal compliance in data requests.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
National Law Articles
Two complaints were lodged with the Italian Public Prosecutor's office concerning acts of mobile theft. In order to identify the perpetrators, the Public Prosecutor's office requested an authorisation to obtain the telephone records of the stolen telephones from all the telephone companies. These requests concerned all the data in the possession of the telephone companies, with tracking and localisation methods, in particular the users and International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) codes of the devices called or making the calls, the sites visited and reached, the times and durations of the calls and connections, the details of the cells and/or towers concerned, and the users and IMEI code of senders and receivers of SMS and MMS. These requests were made to the judge responsible for preliminary investigations at the District Court, Bolzano (‘Giudice delle indagini preliminari presso il Tribunale di Bolzano’) on the basis of an Italian National law, [https://www.garanteprivacy.it/documents/10160/0/Codice+in+materia+di+protezione+dei+dati+personali+%28Testo+coordinato%29 Article 132(3) of Legislative Decree n°196/2003]. The referring court was uncertain whether [https://www.garanteprivacy.it/documents/10160/0/Codice+in+materia+di+protezione+dei+dati+personali+%28Testo+coordinato%29 Article 132(3) of Legislative Decree n°196/2003] is compatible with [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02002L0058-20091219 Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58] (‘ePrivacy Directive’) as interpreted by CJEU, 2 March 2021, Prokuratuur, C-746/18. First, according to paragraph 45 of that judgement, national provisions that allow public authorities to access telephone records containing a set of traffic or location data are justifiable if those provisions are intended for the prosecution of serious offences such as threats to public security and other serious crimes. Second, [https://www.garanteprivacy.it/documents/10160/0/Codice+in+materia+di+protezione+dei+dati+p
Outcome
CJEU Judgment
A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union, typically on a preliminary reference from a national court.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for CJEU case C‑178/22 Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bolzano in EU
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Judgment Date
30 April 2024
Authority
Court of Justice of the European Union
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-cjeu-7857About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. CJEU case C‑178/22 Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bolzano - European Union (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: