Inteligo Media SA – CJEU Judgment (Romania, 2025)

CJEU Judgment
Court of Justice of the European Union13 November 2025Romania
final
ePrivacy
CJEU Judgment

The Court of Justice ruled that Inteligo Media SA did not have a proper legal reason to process users' personal data for sending newsletters. This matters because it highlights the importance of getting clear consent from users before using their information.

What happened

Inteligo Media SA processed personal data of users without proper consent for sending newsletters.

Who was affected

Users who subscribed to the Premium Service of Inteligo Media SA and had their personal data processed.

What the authority found

The Court found that Inteligo Media SA lacked a valid legal basis for processing personal data, violating GDPR requirements for consent.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes that companies must ensure they have clear consent from users before processing their data. It serves as a reminder for businesses to review their data handling practices.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 7(GDPR)
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 83(2) GDPR
Art. 95(GDPR)
Art. 5(3) ePrivacy Directive

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Decision AuthorityCJEU
Reviewed AuthorityRomanian national court
Source verified 12 April 2026
articles corrected
authority corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Inteligo Media SA (the controller) is the publisher of the online news publication, which informs the general public about the legislative changes occurring each day in Romania. By subscribing to a 'Premium Service', users can access more articles per month and receive a daily newsletter, via email, called ‘Personal Update’ (unless the user opts not to benefit from that service). On 26 September 2019, the Romanian DPA (‘the DPA’) concluded that the controller had infringed Article 5(1)(a) and (b), Article 6(1)(a) and Article 7 GDPR and imposed an administrative fine of ca €9,000 (RON 42,714). The DPA had found that the controller had processed the personal data (email addresses, passwords, usernames) of 4,357 users on a legal basis which was not appropriate for the daily transmission via email of the Personal Update, without proving that it had obtained the express consent of the users to the processing of their personal data for that purpose. The controller initiated legal proceeding requesting, principally, the annulment of the DPA's decision and its exemption from liability for the administrative offense. Both the controller and the DPA appealed against a first instance judgement. Those appeals are pending before the referring court. In those circumstances, the referring court decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling: #In a case in which a publisher of online news publications [...] obtains the email address of a user when the latter creates a free user account entitling him or her: (i) to access, free of charge, an additional number of articles from the publication in question; (ii) to receive, via email, a daily newsletter containing a summary of the new legislation discussed in articles within the publication and hyperlinks to those articles; and (iii) to access, for a fee, additional and/or more extensive articles and analyses from the publication compared with those in the free

Outcome

CJEU Judgment

A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union, typically on a preliminary reference from a national court.

Details

Judgment Date

13 November 2025

Authority

Court of Justice of the European Union

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Inteligo Media SA - Romania (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: