Österreichischer Rundfunk - ORF – Court Ruling (Austria, 2026)
Österreichischer Rundfunk (ORF) faced a ruling because its cookie banner made it hard for users to refuse consent for data tracking. This is important for website operators because it highlights the need for clear and fair consent options. The ruling reinforces that rejecting consent should be as easy as accepting it.
What happened
Österreichischer Rundfunk's cookie banner did not provide an equally easy option for users to reject consent compared to accepting it.
Who was affected
Website visitors who encountered ORF's cookie banner were affected by the unfair consent practices.
What the authority found
The court ruled that ORF's cookie banner violated privacy rules by making it harder for users to reject consent than to accept it.
Why this matters
This ruling sets a precedent for how consent banners should be designed, pushing companies to ensure that rejecting consent is just as straightforward as accepting it. Website operators should review their consent mechanisms to avoid similar issues.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
The cookie banner did not offer an equally prominent rejection option and made refusing consent more difficult than accepting it.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Violations (2)
Cookie banner does not provide a clear reject/refuse all button at the same level as the accept button.
Art. 7 GDPR
Refusing cookies requires more clicks or steps than accepting them, or the reject option is less visually prominent.
Art. 7 GDPR
Related Cases (1)
Other cases involving Österreichischer Rundfunk - ORF in AT
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Österreichischer Rundfunk - ORF - Austria (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: