Doctor versus Online Review Platform – Court Ruling (Germany, 2026)

Court Ruling
DPA12 June 2026Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A doctor lost a legal battle against an online review platform that refused to remove a notice about deleted reviews. The court ruled that the platform's notice was lawful, which means it can share information about review moderation. This case is significant for both doctors and online platforms regarding how reviews are handled.

What happened

A doctor sought to remove a notice from an online review platform about reviews that had been deleted.

Who was affected

The doctor whose reviews were removed and who challenged the platform's notice.

What the authority found

The court held that the online review platform was allowed to publish the notice about the deleted reviews as it promoted transparency.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent for how online platforms can manage and communicate about reviews. It highlights the balance between transparency and individual rights, which is important for both service providers and users.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 17(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 17(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityOLG Köln
Reviewed AuthorityLandgericht Köln

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 4 July 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject, a doctor, sought an injunction against the Controller, the operator of an online review platform, requiring the removal of, and prohibiting the future publication of, a notice stating that between six and ten reviews concerning his medical practice had been removed during the previous year following complaints relating to defamation under German law. The Regional Court of Cologne dismissed the application, following which the data subject lodged an immediate appeal before the Higher Regional Court of Cologne. The data subject argued that the notice was inaccurate because the reviews had been challenged on the basis that no genuine patient relationship existed, rather than on the ground of defamation. He submitted that the notice therefore created the false impression that he had complained of defamatory reviews, rendering the processing of his personal data unlawful. The Controller argued that complaints alleging the absence of a genuine customer or patient relationship fell within its internal category of complaints concerning defamation under German law and that publishing the number of removed reviews promoted transparency regarding its review moderation process. The court held that where a data subject seeks not only the erasure of personal data but also an injunction preventing its future publication, Article 17(1) GDPR provides a basis for both forms of relief. It further held that the journalistic exemption under Article 85(2) GDPR did not apply because the Controller's review platform, including the automated notices relating to removed reviews, did not process data for journalistic purposes. The court also held that the displayed number of removed reviews constituted personal data within the meaning of Article 4(1) GDPR because it related to an identified natural person. By storing and disclosing that information, the Controller processed personal data within the meaning of Article 4(2) GDPR. In assessing the accuracy of the notice under

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Doctor versus Online Review Platform in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

12 June 2026

Authority

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Doctor versus Online Review Platform - Germany (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: