Court case VwGH Ro 2025/04/0007-7 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2026)

Court Ruling
DPA VwGH24 June 2026Austria
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Austrian court ruled that an address publisher unlawfully processed personal data related to people's political party preferences. This matters because it shows that companies must handle sensitive data carefully and comply with privacy laws. The ruling highlights the importance of accountability in data processing practices.

What happened

The court found that the address publisher unlawfully processed political party affinity data and parcel-frequency data.

Who was affected

Individuals whose political party preferences were tracked and processed by the address publisher's data application were affected.

What the authority found

The court decided that the data protection authority failed to prove that individuals responsible for the company acted culpably, leading to the annulment of the fine.

Why this matters

This case emphasizes that companies must ensure proper accountability for data processing actions. It serves as a reminder for businesses to establish clear responsibility for compliance with privacy regulations.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 9(1) GDPR
Art. 30(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 35(3)(a) GDPR
Art. 83(3) GDPR
Art. 83(4) GDPR
Art. 83(5) GDPR
Art. 83(6) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 83(4) GDPR
Art. 83(5) GDPR
Art. 83(6) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 9(1) GDPR
Art. 30(GDPR)
Art. 35(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityVwGH
Reviewed AuthorityDSB

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 28 July 2026.

Processing notes: date discrepancy, amount discrepancy.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller was an address publisher and direct advertising company that operated a data application to provide advertisers with personal data for targeted marketing measures. In 2019, following media reports concerning the alleged sale of personal data, particularly information about natural persons’ political party affinity, the Austrian DPA (DSB) initiated an ex officio investigation against the controller. Based on its investigation, the DPA found that the controller had unlawfully processed political party affinity data and unlawfully further processed parcel-frequency data, and had infringed its obligations concerning the DPIA and record of processing activities. It consequently imposed a fine of €18,000,000. The controller appealed to the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG), arguing that the commission of an infringement by a legal person was not, in itself, sufficient for a fine to be imposed under the GDPR. It claimed that since a legal person could not act on its own, the culpable conduct of a natural person had to be identified and attributed to it. The controller argued that the DPA had failed to establish such attribution. The court agreed and, on 26 November 2020, annulled the fine. It found that the DPA had failed to establish that natural persons acting on behalf of the controller had engaged in culpable conduct. The DPA filed an extraordinary official appeal against this judgment with the Austrian Supreme Administrative Court (VwGH). The court stayed the proceedings pending the CJEU’s preliminary ruling in Case C-807/21 (Deutsche Wohnen SE), as the questions referred in that case were also relevant to the appeal proceedings. The CJEU published its judgement on this matter on 5 December 2023. The CJEU held that a fine under Article 83(4) GDPR, Article 83(5) GDPR and Article 83 (6) GDPR may be imposed on anyone who qualifies as a controller where it is established that the controller committed the relevant infringement intentionally or negligentl

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case VwGH Ro 2025/04/0007-7 in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

24 June 2026

Authority

DPA VwGH

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case VwGH Ro 2025/04/0007-7 - Austria (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: