RAMONA FILMS, S.L. – €60,000 Fine (Spain, 2026)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
RAMONA FILMS, S.L. was fined for not having a proper agreement with a payment service provider, which is required for handling personal data. This matters because it shows the importance of having clear contracts when working with other companies.
What happened
The company did not have a data processing agreement with its payment service provider.
Who was affected
Users who subscribed to the company's services were affected.
What the authority found
The authority ruled that the company violated GDPR by failing to have a necessary agreement with its service provider.
Why this matters
This case highlights the need for businesses to have clear agreements with partners handling personal data. Companies should ensure they have proper contracts in place to avoid compliance issues.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 22 August 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
RAMONA FILMS, S.L., the controller, operated websites offering audiovisual content through subscriptions. In November 2023, the DPA fined the controller in proceedings [https://www.aepd.es/documento/ps-00308-2023.pdf PS-00308-2023] for several GDPR infringements, including a breach of Article 28(3) GDPR concerning the absence of a data processing agreement with a payment service provider, the processor. The DPA also ordered the controller, pursuant to Article 58(2)(d) GDPR, to provide within one month the processor agreement concluded with the processor. In December 2023, instead of providing the requested agreement, the controller informed the DPA that the two companies should be considered joint controllers. Following an investigation, the controller provided an unsigned and undated purported joint controller agreement. It subsequently acknowledged that this agreement had never been signed. The controller also stated that it had terminated its relationship with the processor and discontinued its subscription service. However, it was unable to provide evidence of the termination and the DPA found that subscriptions continued to be available through the website and redirected users to the processor's payment service. The controller argued that it had complied with the measures imposed and requested the closure of the proceedings. The DPA found that the controller had infringed Article 58(2) GDPR by failing to comply with the corrective order issued in the previous proceedings. The DPA held that the controller had neither concluded the processor agreement required by the previous decision nor demonstrated that its relationship with the processor had instead been validly established as joint controllership under Article 26 GDPR. In particular, the purported joint controller agreement was unsigned and undated, and the controller ultimately acknowledged that it had never been concluded. The DPA also rejected the controller's arguments that the relationship with the pr
Related Enforcement Actions (2)
Other enforcement actions involving RAMONA FILMS, S.L. in ES
Fine
€60K
Details
Fine Date
9 March 2026
Authority
Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
Fine Amount
€60,000
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-10205About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. RAMONA FILMS, S.L. - Spain (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: