RAMONA FILMS, S.L. – €60,000 Fine (Spain, 2026)

€60,000Agencia Española de Protección de Datos9 March 2026Spain
final
Fine

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

RAMONA FILMS, S.L. was fined for not having a proper agreement with its payment service provider. This matters because it shows that companies must have clear contracts to protect user data. Failing to do so can lead to serious penalties.

What happened

RAMONA FILMS, S.L. lacked a data processing agreement with its payment service provider.

Who was affected

Users who subscribed to RAMONA FILMS' audiovisual content services were affected.

What the authority found

The Spanish data protection authority ruled that RAMONA FILMS had not complied with GDPR requirements for data processing agreements.

Why this matters

This case highlights the importance of having proper agreements with service providers to ensure compliance with data protection laws. Companies should review their contracts to avoid similar issues.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 26(GDPR)
Art. 28(3) GDPR
Art. 58(2) GDPR
Art. 83(6) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 28(3) GDPR
Art. 58(2) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Source verified 22 August 2026
articles corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

RAMONA FILMS, S.L., the controller, operated websites offering audiovisual content through subscriptions. In November 2023, the DPA fined the controller in proceedings [https://www.aepd.es/documento/ps-00308-2023.pdf PS-00308-2023] for several GDPR infringements, including a breach of Article 28(3) GDPR concerning the absence of a data processing agreement with a payment service provider, the processor. The DPA also ordered the controller, pursuant to Article 58(2)(d) GDPR, to provide within one month the processor agreement concluded with the processor. In December 2023, instead of providing the requested agreement, the controller informed the DPA that the two companies should be considered joint controllers. Following an investigation, the controller provided an unsigned and undated purported joint controller agreement. It subsequently acknowledged that this agreement had never been signed. The controller also stated that it had terminated its relationship with the processor and discontinued its subscription service. However, it was unable to provide evidence of the termination and the DPA found that subscriptions continued to be available through the website and redirected users to the processor's payment service. The controller argued that it had complied with the measures imposed and requested the closure of the proceedings. The DPA found that the controller had infringed Article 58(2) GDPR by failing to comply with the corrective order issued in the previous proceedings. The DPA held that the controller had neither concluded the processor agreement required by the previous decision nor demonstrated that its relationship with the processor had instead been validly established as joint controllership under Article 26 GDPR. In particular, the purported joint controller agreement was unsigned and undated, and the controller ultimately acknowledged that it had never been concluded. The DPA also rejected the controller's arguments that the relationship with the pr

Details

Fine Date

9 March 2026

Authority

Agencia Española de Protección de Datos

Fine Amount

€60,000

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-10205

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. RAMONA FILMS, S.L. - Spain (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: