Kindred Group Limited – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2026)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The District Court of The Hague ruled on a case involving Kindred Group Limited, where individuals sought access to their personal data related to online gambling. This matters because it highlights the rights of users to access their data, especially in the gambling industry. The ruling could influence how companies handle data access requests in the future.
What happened
The court considered a case where individuals requested access to their personal data from Kindred Group Limited regarding online gambling.
Who was affected
Individuals who participated in online gambling through Unibet and sought their personal data.
What the authority found
The court examined the claims but did not issue a final ruling on the data access requests at this stage.
Why this matters
This case underscores the importance of user rights to access personal data, which may prompt companies to improve their data handling practices.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
National Law Articles
The District Court of The Hague (the Court) considered an action brought by 51 individuals who had participated in online gambling offered through Unibet before 1 October 2021. At that time, the relevant websites were operated by Risepoint Limited, formerly Trannel International Ltd. Risepoint was the controller in relation to the personal data concerned. Kindred Group Limited had previously been the parent company of Risepoint. The data subjects had authorised Dynamiet Nederland B.V., a commercial legal services provider, to act on their behalf in matters relating to gambling losses. The authorisation expressly included submitting access requests under Article 15 GDPR concerning account and transaction data held by online gambling providers. Between December 2024 and January 2025, the data subjects, acting through Dynamiet Nederland, submitted access requests to the controller under Article 15 GDPR. They requested, among other things, their personal data, account and contractual information, financial transactions and detailed information concerning their gambling activity. The controller did not provide the requested data. The data subjects subsequently brought proceedings seeking an order requiring the controller to provide the requested information. They also requested a penalty payment in the event of non-compliance. The controller argued, among other things, that the claims should not be examined because of Maltese legislation restricting certain GDPR rights and because the requirements of Article 80(1) GDPR were not fulfilled. The Court held that Maltese Subsidiary Legislation 586.09 did not automatically justify refusing an Article 15 GDPR access request. Although Article 23 GDPR allows certain restrictions on data subject rights, such restrictions must still be necessary and proportionate. The controller had also failed to demonstrate that the requests were abusive or excessive. However, the Court did not assess whether Article 15 GDPR had been infringed.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Kindred Group Limited in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Kindred Group Limited - Netherlands (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: