Enforcing jurisdiction
Belgium · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case 34/2020 – Violation Found (Belgium, 2020)

Violation Found
Autorité de Protection des Données23 June 2020Belgium
final
Violation Found

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Belgium's data protection authority found that the Federal Public Service Mobility and Transportation misused personal data from a national vehicle database. They shared this data with insurance companies to create personalized offers without following proper rules. This decision highlights the importance of handling personal data responsibly and transparently.

What happened

The Federal Public Service Mobility and Transportation shared personal data from a national vehicle database with insurance companies for marketing purposes.

Who was affected

Visitors whose vehicle data was accessed and used by insurance companies for personalized pricing.

What the authority found

The authority ruled that the Federal Public Service Mobility and Transportation violated GDPR by not properly limiting the purpose of data use and failing to notify about data breaches.

Why this matters

This case emphasizes that organizations must comply with data protection rules when using personal data, especially for marketing. Companies should ensure they have clear purposes and legal bases for processing personal data.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 12 GDPR
Art. 13 GDPR
Art. 14 GDPR
Art. 24 GDPR
Art. 31 GDPR
Art. 32 GDPR
Art. 33 GDPR
Art. 37 GDPR
Art. 38 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 14(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 25 Royal Decree of 8th of July 2013

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

In May 2019 the Inspection service of the GBA started an investigation into the Federal Public Service Mobility and Transportation. GBA wanted to know about the information portal NV Informex, its access to the national data-bank of vehicles and the fact that data from this data-bank was shared with insurance companies for the purposes of creating personalized price offers to its potential customers. The report of the Inspection service found the following violations: 1. Breach of the principles of purpose limitation (Article 5) and lawfulness (Article 6) of processing; 2. Breach of the responsibilities of a controller (Article 24), security of processing (Article 32) and violation of the obligation to notify supervisory authority of the personal data breach (Article 33); 3. Breach of the requirements for designation (Article 37) and position (Article 38) of data protection officer; 4. Breach of the obligation to cooperate with the supervisory authority (Article 31); 5. Breach of transparency (Article 12) and information provision (Article 13) obligations. The Dispute Chamber of the GBA found that the use of personal data obtained via the data-bank of vehicles by customers of NV Informex, in particular insurance companies, for the purpose of creating personalized price offers constitutes direct marketing and violates Articles 5 and 6 of the GDPR and Article 25 of the Royal Decree of 8th of July 2013. The Federal Public Service Mobility and Transportation was ordered to bring this personal data processing in compliance with GDPR within 6 months. The Dispute Chamber also issued a reprimand against the Federal Public Service Mobility and Transportation for violating Articles 12, 13, 14 of GDPR and ordered to bring the relevant information provisions in compliance with GDPR within 3 months.

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 34/2020 in BE

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

23 June 2020

Authority

Autorité de Protection des Données

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-2512

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 34/2020 - Belgium (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: