Enforcing jurisdiction
Slovenia · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

DPA case 07121-1/2020/1869 – Violation Found (Slovenia, 2020)

Violation Found
Informacijski pooblaščenec20 October 2020Slovenia
final
Violation Found

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A complaint was filed against a bank in Slovenia for requesting too much information from a person flagged as politically exposed. The DPA found that the bank was allowed to ask for this information under the law. This ruling clarifies the bank's rights and obligations regarding sensitive data.

What happened

The Slovenian DPA upheld a complaint about a bank's request for additional information from a politically exposed person.

Who was affected

A person flagged by the bank as politically exposed who was asked for more information about their assets.

What the authority found

The DPA ruled that the bank's request for information was lawful under anti-money laundering regulations.

Why this matters

This case illustrates the balance between privacy and legal obligations for financial institutions. Businesses should understand their responsibilities when handling sensitive information.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 13 GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 61 ZPPDFT-1

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On October 9th, a complainant submitted a request to the Slovenian DPA (IP) to ask them whether the complainant was obliged to provide a bank with more accurate information about their assets. The bank had flagged the complainant as a politically exposed person, on the basis of Article 61 of the Act on Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Slovenian Legislation, ZPPDFT-1). The complainant believed the bank's request was excessive and that there was no basis for processing the data related to his assets. Therefore, the complainant filed a complaint with the DPA. Whether a bank was within its right to request from a data subject who had been flagged as a "politically exposed person" additional information about the nature of their assets. The Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Act requires the collection of certain data from politically exposed persons. Article 61, ZPPDFT-1 defines as a politically exposed person any natural person who acts or has acted in a prominent public position in a Member State or a third country in the last year, including his immediate family members (among whom according to the fourth paragraph of the same the spouse or common-law partner, parents and children and their spouses or common-law partners) and close associates. Having regard to this, the Act provides an appropriate legal basis for obtaining statutory personal data from individuals identified by banks as politically exposed persons and their immediate family members in accordance with Article 6(1)(c) GDPR. Article 6(1)(c) stipulates that processing is lawful when it is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject to. The DPA held that obtaining legally required information on the assets and origin of assets from an individual identified as a politically exposed person falls within the bank's scope of obligation, based on the Anti-Money Laundering Act. However, the DPA did note that even though the bank had t

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 07121-1/2020/1869 in SI

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

20 October 2020

Authority

Informacijski pooblaščenec

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-2869

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 07121-1/2020/1869 - Slovenia (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: