- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Spain · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
DPA case PS/00054/2020 – Violation Found (Spain, 2021)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A neighbor in Spain was warned by the Data Protection Authority for installing video cameras that monitored shared areas without permission. The authority found that the surveillance was excessive for the reasons given. This case emphasizes the need for proper consent when using surveillance systems in shared spaces.
What happened
The Data Protection Authority found that a neighbor's video surveillance system was excessive and imposed a warning.
Who was affected
Neighbors living in the community where the video surveillance cameras were installed.
What the authority found
The authority decided that the neighbor's use of video cameras without consent from other neighbors violated data protection rules.
Why this matters
This ruling highlights the importance of obtaining consent from all parties when setting up surveillance systems in shared areas. It serves as a reminder for individuals to respect privacy in their communities.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
No issues were reported by that automated check.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The complainant lodged a complaint with the AEPD about the installation of video surveillance cameras in the neighbours' doorway, from which several entrances to homes could be monitored, and believed that excessive and disproportionate use was being made of the video surveillance system in relation to data protection regulations. The defendant responded that the installation of the video surveillance system was necessary to protect himself and his family from neighbourhood disputes caused by non-payment by his tenants. Is the installation of a video surveillance system in a community of neighbours, without the authorization of the rest of the neighbours, a breach of Article 13 GDPR? The AEPD held that the video surveillance system was excessive in relation to the purposes alleged by the defendant. It imposed a warning sanction and ordered that the system should only be operational when the defendant or his family were living at the address where the camera was located. Given that the defendant is a natural person, that there is no evidence of recidivism and that, furthermore, he has shown cooperation with the AEPD in repairing the possible damage caused, it was decided to impose a warning sanction.
Outcome
Violation Found
The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case PS/00054/2020 in ES
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case PS/00054/2020 - Spain (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: