DPA case Délibération n°13FR/2021 – Violation Found (Luxembourg, 2021)

Violation Found
Commission Nationale pour la Protection des Données21 April 2021Luxembourg
final
Violation Found

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Luxembourg data authority found that a company violated privacy rules by not properly informing employees about a geolocation system in their vehicles. The company had only given oral information, which was not enough to prove compliance. This case shows the need for clear and documented communication about data use.

What happened

A company was investigated for not adequately informing employees about a geolocation system on vehicles.

Who was affected

Employees whose locations were tracked by the geolocation system.

What the authority found

The Luxembourg data authority concluded that the company violated privacy rules by failing to provide clear, documented information about data processing.

Why this matters

This ruling stresses the importance of clear communication and documentation in data privacy. Companies should ensure that employees are fully informed about any data collection practices.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
View original scraped data
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 37 Loi du 1er août 2018

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The Luxembourg DPA launched an investigation on a controller that had implemented a geolocation system on their snowplowing and salting vehicles. Such system used on-line software, although the data was not transferred via WiFi but via phone cards. The employees participated in the activities relating such vehicles on a voluntary basis. They had only been informed about the system, however, orally. The DPA argued that, even if Article 12 GDPR does not de facto exclude the possibility of providing the information from Articles 13 and 14 orally, it poses an accountability problem. The controller must be able to demonstrate that it has provided such information. However, having provided the information in an oral manner, in this case the controller could not prove that had provided the information, and therefore the DPA concluded that the controller had violated Article 13 GDPR. The DPA took into account that the controller had implemented, during the proceedings, adequate measures to fulfill their information obligation, following the authority's proposal. Therefore, the CNPD decided to only warn the controller.

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case Délibération n°13FR/2021 in LU

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

21 April 2021

Authority

Commission Nationale pour la Protection des Données

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-3536

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case Délibération n°13FR/2021 - Luxembourg (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: