DPA case Délibération n°13FR/2021 – Violation Found (Luxembourg, 2021)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Luxembourg data authority found that a company violated privacy rules by not properly informing employees about a geolocation system in their vehicles. The company had only given oral information, which was not enough to prove compliance. This case shows the need for clear and documented communication about data use.
What happened
A company was investigated for not adequately informing employees about a geolocation system on vehicles.
Who was affected
Employees whose locations were tracked by the geolocation system.
What the authority found
The Luxembourg data authority concluded that the company violated privacy rules by failing to provide clear, documented information about data processing.
Why this matters
This ruling stresses the importance of clear communication and documentation in data privacy. Companies should ensure that employees are fully informed about any data collection practices.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The Luxembourg DPA launched an investigation on a controller that had implemented a geolocation system on their snowplowing and salting vehicles. Such system used on-line software, although the data was not transferred via WiFi but via phone cards. The employees participated in the activities relating such vehicles on a voluntary basis. They had only been informed about the system, however, orally. The DPA argued that, even if Article 12 GDPR does not de facto exclude the possibility of providing the information from Articles 13 and 14 orally, it poses an accountability problem. The controller must be able to demonstrate that it has provided such information. However, having provided the information in an oral manner, in this case the controller could not prove that had provided the information, and therefore the DPA concluded that the controller had violated Article 13 GDPR. The DPA took into account that the controller had implemented, during the proceedings, adequate measures to fulfill their information obligation, following the authority's proposal. Therefore, the CNPD decided to only warn the controller.
Outcome
Violation Found
The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case Délibération n°13FR/2021 in LU
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Decision Date
21 April 2021
Authority
Commission Nationale pour la Protection des Données
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-3536About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case Délibération n°13FR/2021 - Luxembourg (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: