DPA case Délibération n°43FR/2021 – No Violation (Luxembourg, 2021)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Luxembourg Data Protection Authority found no violation regarding a not-for-profit association's appointment of a Data Protection Officer. The authority concluded that the association was not required to have a DPO since it wasn't processing sensitive data. This case highlights the importance of understanding when a DPO is necessary for compliance.
What happened
The Luxembourg DPA determined that the association did not need to appoint a Data Protection Officer.
Who was affected
The not-for-profit association that was under audit for its data protection practices.
What the authority found
The Data Protection Authority found that the association had incorrectly concluded it needed a Data Protection Officer under Article 37(1) GDPR.
Why this matters
This decision clarifies the criteria for appointing a Data Protection Officer, helping organizations understand their compliance obligations better.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
No issues were reported by that automated check.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
In 2018, the Luxembourg DPA (the CNPD) initiated 25 different audit proceedings both in the private and public sector with regard to the role of the Data Protection Officer (DPO) under Section 4 of Chapter 4 of the GDPR (see in particular Article 37 GDPR to Article 39 GDPR). One of these audit proceedings concerned a not-for-profit association (Association Sans But Lucratif) established under Luxembourg law (hereafter, the ASBL). The ASBL is part of a confederation specialised in the provision of social services. In that context, the ASBL has established different partnerships with various entities providing social services in Luxembourg (the Patner Entities). The core activities of the ASBL is therefore not to provide social services, but rather to manage the funding of the Partner Entities, validate common strategies for the confederation, and determine which Partner Entities are responsible for their implementation. During the audit, it was found by the head of investigation of the CNPD that the ASBL had appointed a DPO pursuant to Article 37(1) GDPR. No violation of the obligations relating to the role and position of the DPO was found. In the course of the proceedings, the CNPD questioned however the necessity for the ASBL to appoint a DPO in the first place. The CNPD therefore invited the head of investigation to get complementary information on that point. The head of investigation further communicated with the ASBL, and concluded that the latter was under the obligation to appoint a DPO. Based on the received complementary information, the CNPD decided not to concur with the conclusion of the head of investigation. Taking into account the managerial role of the ASBL within the confederation, and in particular the fact that the ASBL itself was not processing health data for the provision of social services, the CNPD found that the ASBL had wrongfully concluded that it was under an obligation to appoint a DPO pursuant Article 37(1) GDPR. The CNPD further poi
Outcome
No Violation
The DPA investigated and found no violation.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case Délibération n°43FR/2021 in LU
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Decision Date
27 October 2021
Authority
Commission Nationale pour la Protection des Données
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-4388About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case Délibération n°43FR/2021 - Luxembourg (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: