DPA case 117/2022 – Order (Belgium, 2022)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
Belgium's data protection authority dismissed a complaint from a former customer who received direct marketing from a company. The authority found that the company could still use the customer's data for marketing because their relationship had ended recently. This decision is significant as it clarifies how businesses can use legitimate interest for marketing purposes.
What happened
A complaint about receiving direct marketing from a former customer was dismissed by the Belgian DPA.
Who was affected
The affected person was a former customer of the company that sent direct marketing.
What the authority found
The authority ruled that the company did not breach GDPR because the former customer could reasonably expect to receive marketing communications shortly after their relationship ended.
Why this matters
This case sets a precedent for how companies can use legitimate interest to send marketing to former customers. It reminds businesses to consider the timing of customer relationships when planning marketing strategies.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
No issues were reported by that automated check.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject was a former customer of the controller (which remained unknown). The data subject received direct marketing from the controller. The data subject objected to the further processing of its personal data while also requesting access to all personal data processed by the controller and the legal basis used to send the direct marketing. The controller responded within 30 days, confirming that the data subject would no longer receive direct marketing and provided all processed data, including the applicable legal bases. The data subject then submitted a complaint at the DPA stating that the controller cannot rely on legitimate interest for processing its email adress as the data subject was a former, not current customer. The DPA held that a controller is allowed to rely on legitimate interest to send direct marketing, including former customers under certain conditions, pursuant to Recital 47 GDPR and its Guidance 01/2020 on Direct Marketing (nr. 168). In its Guidance, it was stated that when there was no relationship between the controller and data subject, or when it goes back a long time, legitimate interest cannot be invoked, as direct marketing is not part of the data subject's reasonable expectations. The DPA followed that because the relationship between the controller and the data subject ended not that long ago (around two years prior), a contrario, the data subject could reasonably expect that his data would still be used for direct marketing. Hence the controller could use legitimate interest as a legal basis. In addition, the controller confirmed that the processing for direct marketing is only done up to two years after the cancellation of the service. The DPA therefore held that the controller did not breach the GDPR and dismissed the case.
Outcome
Order
A binding order requiring the controller to take specific action.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 117/2022 in BE
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 117/2022 - Belgium (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: