Enforcing jurisdiction
Malta · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case EDPBI:MT:OSS:D:2022:341 – Complaint Upheld (Malta, 2022)

Complaint Upheld
Information and Data Protection Commissioner4 March 2022Malta
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A person complained that a game provider asked for a copy of their ID to access their data. The Information and Data Protection Commissioner of Malta agreed that the provider should have used other information to verify the person's identity. This ruling emphasizes that companies must respect users' rights to access their data without unnecessary demands.

What happened

A game provider required a copy of a person's ID to process their access request.

Who was affected

The person who requested access to their data from the game provider.

What the authority found

The Commissioner ruled that the game provider violated the requirement to comply with access requests under GDPR.

Why this matters

This decision highlights the importance of not overstepping when verifying a user's identity. Companies should ensure they have clear procedures that respect users' rights.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 15 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 61 GDPR
Art. 12(2) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(b) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 12(2) GDPR
Art. 15(GDPR)
Art. 58(2)(b) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR
Art. 61(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject filed an access request pursuant of Article 15 GDPR. The controller (most likely a game provider, specifics not disclosed) asked a certified copy of an identity card or passport. The data subject provided a photo of his identity card but stated that the request for an ID photo was contrary to the GDPR. The controller should have used other information it possessed for identity verification. The data subject filed a complaint against the controller at the Berlin DPA on 30 October 2020, which lodged a mutual assistance notification under Article 61 GDPR. After the Berlin DPA transferred the complaint, the Information and data protection commissioner of Malta (DPA) was the Lead Supervisory Authority in this Article 60 GDPR procedure. The controller stated that it had received false requests in the past and needed to adopt additional measures, such as requesting proof of identity. The controller's customer support agents occasionally requested additional methods of verification, such as a certified or notarised copy of user’s identification documents (defined in recital 64 GDPR as 'identity verification'). The controller stated at first that data subject had multiple user accounts, which had caused doubts regarding the identity of the data subject. However, the controller later informed the DPA that the data subject only had one account. Relevant provisions and considerations WP29 The DPA held that the controller violated Article 12(2) by not complying with the access request (Article 15 GDPR). The controller stated that Article 12(2) aims to ensure substantive rights for data subjects by establishing clear, proportionate and effective conditions as to how and when data subjects can exercise their rights. Also, the controller was not allowed not refuse to act on the request of data subjects for exercising their rights under Articles 15 – 22 GDPR, unless the controller was not able to identify the data subject. The controller should also us

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case EDPBI:MT:OSS:D:2022:341 in MT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

4 March 2022

Authority

Information and Data Protection Commissioner

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5382

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case EDPBI:MT:OSS:D:2022:341 - Malta (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: