- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Malta · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
DPA case EDPBI:MT:OSS:D:2022:341 – Complaint Upheld (Malta, 2022)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A person complained that a game provider asked for a copy of their ID to access their data. The Information and Data Protection Commissioner of Malta agreed that the provider should have used other information to verify the person's identity. This ruling emphasizes that companies must respect users' rights to access their data without unnecessary demands.
What happened
A game provider required a copy of a person's ID to process their access request.
Who was affected
The person who requested access to their data from the game provider.
What the authority found
The Commissioner ruled that the game provider violated the requirement to comply with access requests under GDPR.
Why this matters
This decision highlights the importance of not overstepping when verifying a user's identity. Companies should ensure they have clear procedures that respect users' rights.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject filed an access request pursuant of Article 15 GDPR. The controller (most likely a game provider, specifics not disclosed) asked a certified copy of an identity card or passport. The data subject provided a photo of his identity card but stated that the request for an ID photo was contrary to the GDPR. The controller should have used other information it possessed for identity verification. The data subject filed a complaint against the controller at the Berlin DPA on 30 October 2020, which lodged a mutual assistance notification under Article 61 GDPR. After the Berlin DPA transferred the complaint, the Information and data protection commissioner of Malta (DPA) was the Lead Supervisory Authority in this Article 60 GDPR procedure. The controller stated that it had received false requests in the past and needed to adopt additional measures, such as requesting proof of identity. The controller's customer support agents occasionally requested additional methods of verification, such as a certified or notarised copy of user’s identification documents (defined in recital 64 GDPR as 'identity verification'). The controller stated at first that data subject had multiple user accounts, which had caused doubts regarding the identity of the data subject. However, the controller later informed the DPA that the data subject only had one account. Relevant provisions and considerations WP29 The DPA held that the controller violated Article 12(2) by not complying with the access request (Article 15 GDPR). The controller stated that Article 12(2) aims to ensure substantive rights for data subjects by establishing clear, proportionate and effective conditions as to how and when data subjects can exercise their rights. Also, the controller was not allowed not refuse to act on the request of data subjects for exercising their rights under Articles 15 – 22 GDPR, unless the controller was not able to identify the data subject. The controller should also us
Outcome
Complaint Upheld
A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case EDPBI:MT:OSS:D:2022:341 in MT
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Decision Date
4 March 2022
Authority
Information and Data Protection Commissioner
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-5382About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case EDPBI:MT:OSS:D:2022:341 - Malta (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: