Enforcing jurisdiction
Italy · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

DPA case 9852214 – Violation Found (Italy, 2023)

Violation Found
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali2 February 2023Italy
final
Violation Found

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An investigation into the Replika chatbot revealed that it lacked proper age verification for users. The Italian DPA found that the company did not adequately protect minors from inappropriate content. This case underscores the need for companies to implement strong safeguards for vulnerable users.

What happened

The Replika app did not have any age verification mechanisms in place for users creating accounts.

Who was affected

Users of the Replika app, particularly minors and emotionally vulnerable individuals.

What the authority found

The DPA ruled that the company failed to implement necessary protections for minors and did not clearly disclose how personal data was processed.

Why this matters

This case serves as a warning for tech companies to prioritize user safety, especially for minors. Businesses must ensure their services are compliant with privacy regulations and protect vulnerable users.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5 GDPR
Art. 6 GDPR
Art. 8 GDPR
Art. 9 GDPR
Art. 25 GDPR
Art. 58(1) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(GDPR)
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 8(GDPR)
Art. 9(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 58(1) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(f) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller is Luka Inc, a US-based company that developed and operated Replika, an AI-powered chatbot. According to the controller, Replika can improve the user's mood and emotional well-being by helping them understand their thoughts and feelings, keep track of their mood, learn coping skills (i.e., stress control), calm anxiety, and work towards goals such as positive thinking, stress management, socialising, and finding love. In other words, Replika provides a kind of 'virtual friend' that users can configure as friend, partner or mentor. Various reports were published in Italian media concerning inappropriate content on the Replika app, which would pose concrete risks particularly to minors and emotionally vulnerable people. Subsequently, the Italian DPA conducted an investigation focusing on the collection of personal data and the app’s age verification mechanisms. The investigation revealed that, regardless of what the company stated in its privacy policy or terms of service, no age verification procedure was in place when users created an account. Moreover, the controller had not implemented any blocking method for users who could be believed to be underage during the use of Replika, for example based on the content of their responses. The investigation also showed that the privacy policy failed to disclose information on the key elements of the processing, in particular the legal grounds and the use of children’s personal data. The DPA held that the legal basis for the processing activities could hardly be determined from the controller's privacy policy. In doing so, the DPA also ruled out any legal grounds under Article 6(1)(b) GDPR (contractual necessity). Children, the DPA argued, are legally incapacitated to enter contracts under Italian law, especially when performance of such contracts implies making available a substantial amount of personal data, as in this case. Hence, the DPA ruled that the processing of personal data, in particular of

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 9852214 in IT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

2 February 2023

Authority

Garante per la protezione dei dati personali

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5663

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 9852214 - Italy (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: