Enforcing jurisdiction
Belgium · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case 09/2023 – Complaint Upheld (Belgium, 2023)

Complaint Upheld
Autorité de Protection des Données9 February 2023Belgium
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A person received unwanted marketing emails and asked the company to remove their email address from its list. Despite the company's promise to act, the person continued to receive emails. The Belgian Data Protection Authority ruled that the company failed to comply with the request to erase the person's email. This case is significant because it shows that companies must take erasure requests seriously and act on them promptly.

What happened

A person requested to have their email removed from a marketing list but continued to receive emails.

Who was affected

The person who requested the removal of their email address from the company's marketing list.

What the authority found

The Belgian Data Protection Authority found that the company did not comply with the erasure request as required by law.

Why this matters

This ruling highlights the obligation of companies to respect users' requests for data erasure, emphasizing the importance of user rights in data protection.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 12(4) GDPR
Art. 17(1) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(c) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 17(1) GDPR
Art. 58(2) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

As a result of receiving unsolicited advertising by e-mail sent by the controller, the data subject requested the controller on 9 November 2022 and 2 weeks later again to remove his e-mail address from its address list. Notwithstanding the controller's answer announcing necessary steps would have been taken in order to remove the e-mail address from the list, the data subject received unsolicited advertising by e-mail on 16 January 2023. The data subject filed a complaint with the Belgian Data Protection Authority claiming lack of appropriate action following receipt of the erasure request. The complaint showed that the data subject had correctly exercised his right to erasure. Despite the controller's announcement, according to which appropriate measure would have been taken to remove the data subject's email address from its marketing list, no concrete follow-up action had been taken. In fact, the data subject had received another marketing email. The DPA concluded the controller violated Article 12(3) GDPR, 12(4) GDPR and Article 17(1) GDPR and ordered it to comply with the erasure request within a timeframe of 30 days from the notification of its decision pursuant of Article 58(2)(c) GDPR.

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 09/2023 in BE

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

9 February 2023

Authority

Autorité de Protection des Données

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5673

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 09/2023 - Belgium (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: