- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Denmark · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
DPA case 2023-212-0015 – Violation Found (Denmark, 2023)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
Denmark's data protection authority advised against a city's plan to use AI for identifying citizens needing rehabilitation. This is significant because it raises concerns about how personal data is used in AI applications.
What happened
The City of Copenhagen sought approval to develop an AI tool for identifying citizens in need of rehabilitation services.
Who was affected
Citizens whose data would be processed by the AI tool.
What the authority found
The authority concluded that the city's plan would involve high-risk processing without clear legal backing.
Why this matters
This ruling highlights the need for clear legal frameworks when using AI for personal data processing, urging companies to carefully consider the implications of their technology.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
On 22 March 2023, the City of Copenhagen requested the Danish DPA to issue an opinion on whether they could lawfully develop and implement an AI tool to identify citizens in need of rehabilitation. In this request, the City submitted the following information in relation to the sources of data used, legal basis for processing and the purposes of processing: Firstly, the purpose of the algorithm was intended to help make rehabilitation services available to a wider demographic. It was not intended to deprive citizens who would normally be entitled to rehabilitation services, but rather to assist municipal staff in identifying which other citizens were in need of rehabilitative assistance. Secondly, the sources of data which the City wished to process were national patient medical records, these records included information such as patients’ social security number, age, date of birth, and gender. Thirdly, the City wished to rely on Articles 6(1)(e) and 9(1)(g) GDPR. Under Article 6(3) GDPR, reliance on Article 6(1)(e) GDPR as a legal basis for processing must be laid down by Union law or Member State law. As a result, the City of Copenhagen submitted that they were relying on [https://english.sm.dk/media/14900/consolidation-act-on-social-services.pdf section 86] of the Danish Social Services Act. Section 86 provides that the local council must offer rehabilitation services to residents who have physical impairment. The Danish DPA issued a negative opinion regarding the City’s plan to develop the AI tool, because the national law relied upon did not define the scope of the AI tool’s use. The DPA concluded that the use of the AI tool would constitute high-risk processing, as the AI tool would produce a decision-supporting prediction about an individual citizen, which would influence the citizen's access to health care services. Even though the AI tool was not intended to deprive residents of rehabilitation services and was intended to have positive consequences,
Outcome
Violation Found
The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 2023-212-0015 in DK
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 2023-212-0015 - Denmark (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: