Enforcing jurisdiction
Finland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case 5546/163/2019 – Violation Found (Finland, 2022)

Violation Found
DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu19 August 2022Finland
final
Violation Found

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Finnish healthcare provider was found to have security issues with its online appointment booking system. This is important because it shows that healthcare organizations must protect patients' personal information from unauthorized access.

What happened

The healthcare provider failed to ensure the confidentiality of its online appointment booking system.

Who was affected

Patients who used the online appointment booking system and had their personal identity codes potentially exposed.

What the authority found

The Finnish DPA determined that the provider did not adequately protect personal data, violating GDPR's security requirements.

Why this matters

This case serves as a warning to healthcare providers about the importance of strong security measures. Organizations must prioritize safeguarding personal data to avoid breaches.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 32(2) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(b) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 9(1) GDPR
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 32(2) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(b) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

In 2019, the Finnish DPA had asked a healthcare provider (the controller) to explain how its online appointment booking system worked. In response to the request, the controller clarified that a user had to log in to the booking system with their name and personal identity code. The system had compared the information provided by the user against the information stored in the controller's patient information system. The user had been instructed to check the login information if it did not match the information in the patient information system. The controller acknowledged that, under certain conditions, the online appointment booking service could have been used to determine the complete personal identity code of a data subject by using brute force technique. The controller considered that this could have been prevented by limiting the retries of incorrectly entered login information. The controller also stated that it was able to investigate possible misuse by examining the log data collected from the service. The controller was aware that the personal identity code may often be known to people other than the data subject. However, the controller had assessed the overall risks to be low or moderate in terms of likelihood and severity. In 2020, the controller had submitted a data breach notification to the DPA, according to which the controller's online appointment booking system had been targeted by phishing. The phishing had come to light as a result of a blackmail message received by the controller, which revealed that a third party had obtained personal identity codes through the system. Following the breach, the controller had switched to strong electronic identification in its system. The DPA stated that the controller had failed to ensure the continuous confidentiality of the online appointment booking system. It had been possible to use the system to determine the complete personal identity code and a third party had also gained access to personal identity

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 5546/163/2019 in FI

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

19 August 2022

Authority

DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-7480

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 5546/163/2019 - Finland (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: