Enforcing jurisdiction
Croatia · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

DPA case 05/01/2026 – €6,636 Fine (Croatia, 2026)

€6,636Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka5 January 2026Croatia
final
Fine

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Croatian retail store was fined for not informing customers about video surveillance in the shop. This is important because it highlights the obligation for businesses to be transparent about monitoring practices. The fine serves as a reminder for all retailers to clearly communicate surveillance to their customers.

What happened

The store failed to display any notice about being under video surveillance.

Who was affected

Customers who entered the store without being informed about the video monitoring.

What the authority found

The authority found that the store violated the requirement to inform individuals about video surveillance as per data protection laws.

Why this matters

This case underscores the importance of transparency in data processing practices. Retailers must ensure that customers are aware of surveillance to comply with privacy regulations.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 13 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1) GDPR
Art. 13(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 27(1) Croatian Act on the Implementation of the GDPR
Art. 27(2) Croatian Act on the Implementation of the GDPR
Art. 51(1) Croatian Act on the Implementation of the GDPR

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, amount discrepancy.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 20 August 2025, the Croatian Data Protection Authority (AZOP) carried out an unannounced inspection in a context of an ex oficio investigation at a retail branch inside a shopping centre (the controller). The inspection examined the processing of personal data through a video surveillance system installed in the shop. During the inspection, AZOP found seven surveillance cameras installed inside the store. A store employee informed the authority that the system had been installed when the branch opened in 2016. The controller used the cameras to protect employees, property and goods in the shop. Employees could access the recordings through a computer using an application. The authority checked the system and confirmed that recordings were stored and that the oldest available recording dated from 18 August 2025. AZOP inspected the premises and found that the controller had not displayed any notice informing visitors that the space was under video surveillance. The authority did not find a sign at the entrance of the shop, on the storefront window or inside the premises. AZOP held that the controller violated Article 27(1) of the Croatian Act on the Implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (Zakon o provedbi Opće uredbe o zaštiti podataka). Article 27(1) of the Act requires controllers to mark the premises and surrounding areas under video surveillance. AZOP clarified that this obligation ensures transparency when controllers process personal data through video surveillance. Video recordings that show identifiable individuals constitute personal data processing. Therefore, individuals must be informed about the monitoring before they enter the recorded area. The authority further explained that Article 27(2) of the Act requires the information provided under Article 27(1) to comply with the information requirements of Article 13 GDPR. When determining the sanction under Article 83(2) GDPR, AZOP considered the duration and seriousness of the infring

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 05/01/2026 in HR

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Fine Date

5 January 2026

Authority

Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka

Fine Amount

€6,636

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-9878

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 05/01/2026 - Croatia (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: