Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case 2025-0.950.759 – Complaint Upheld (Austria, 2025)

Complaint Upheld
Datenschutzbehörde24 November 2025Austria
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A customer complained that an online shop used gender-specific titles despite their request for gender-neutral language. The shop initially said it was working on a solution but later sent a newsletter using the title 'Ms.' The case emphasizes the need for businesses to respect customer preferences in communication.

What happened

An online shop continued to use gender-specific titles after a customer requested gender-neutral forms of address.

Who was affected

The customer who created an account with the online shop.

What the authority found

The authority upheld the complaint, indicating that the shop did not adequately address the customer's request for gender-neutral communication.

Why this matters

This ruling highlights the importance of respecting customer preferences and adapting communication practices accordingly. Online businesses should implement systems to accommodate diverse customer identities.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 16 GDPR
Art. 17 GDPR
Art. 25 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 16(GDPR)
Art. 17(GDPR)
Art. 25(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 8 ECHR

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 18 September 2023, a data subject created a customer account with a public limited company operating an online shop (the controller). It allowed customers to place orders either as guests or through an optional customer account. During the registration process, the data subject's personal data was collected, including a gender-specific title. The only options provided for the title were "Mr." and "Ms.", with no option to select no title. The data subject selected “Ms.” during the registration process. The data subject then informed the controller about this situation and requested that it should refrain from using gender-specific forms of address regarding them. The controller initially assured the data subject that it would inform the relevant department. Later, the controller communicated that implementing the requested adjustment was currently not technically feasible, but that a solution was being worked on. On 14 May 2025, the data subject received a newsletter from the controller in which a gender specific salutation (specifically "Ms.") was used. On 16 May 2025, the data subject lodged a complaint with the Austrian DPA against the controller. The data subject argued that the controller had infringed their rights regarding the principles of data processing under Article 5 GDPR, the rights to rectification under Article 16 GDPR, to erasure under Article 17 GDPR and to data protection by design and by default under Article 25 GDPR. Τhe controller stated in its privacy notice that it was necessary to process customers’ personal data for registration purposes under Article 6(1)(b) GDPR. Moreover, the controller also claimed reliance on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. During the proceedings before the DPA, the controller restructured its IT system. On 8 September 2025, the controller announced that it had implemented gender-neutral forms of address in its online shop and requested for the complaint to be dismissed. The DPA first noted that, during the proceedings, the

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 2025-0.950.759 in AT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

24 November 2025

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-10044

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 2025-0.950.759 - Austria (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: