DPA case PS/00009/2026 – Violation Found (Spain, 2026)

Violation Found
Agencia Española de Protección de Datos23 September 2026Spain
final
Violation Found

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A company planned to use an AI tool for hiring but received a warning from the data protection authority for not ensuring proper data protection measures. The authority stressed the importance of assessing risks and being transparent with employees about how their data is used. This case serves as a reminder for businesses to prioritize data protection when implementing new technologies.

What happened

The company intended to implement an AI tool for screening job candidates without fully assessing data protection risks.

Who was affected

Employees whose personal data would be processed by the AI tool were affected.

What the authority found

The authority warned the company for not implementing adequate data protection measures and failing to assess risks associated with the AI system.

Why this matters

This situation highlights the necessity for companies to prioritize data protection when adopting new technologies, ensuring compliance with regulations to avoid potential issues.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 22 GDPR
Art. 24 GDPR
Art. 25 GDPR
Art. 35 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 14(GDPR)
Art. 22(GDPR)
Art. 24(GDPR)
Art. 25(GDPR)
Art. 35(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 67 LOPDGDD

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Αn enterprise (the controller) planned the implementation of an AI tool intended to be used for the screening and evaluation of candidates in recruitment and internal mobility processes. The system will seek to analyse resumes, assign scores and prioritise candidates which may have a direct influence on the decisions regarding employment and promotions. Clarified was that final decisions were to be made by a human. The controller notified its employees of the implementation of this system in December. The DPA started an investigation. The controller clarified that it is part of a group of undertakings which is carrying out the evaluation and development of the system including compliance with data protection at a central level. Regardless, the controller emphasised it would analyse the established data protection implications and take appropriate measures prior to putting the system into operation. Following the investigation, the DPA issued a warning to the controller. The DPA addressed the controller’s obligation to ensure data protection by design and default and to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure data protection compliant processing in accordance with Articles 24 and 25 GDPR. More specifically, the DPA addressed the necessity for a risk assessment posed by the system, and if the processing is likely to result in a high-risk, to also implement the necessary DPIA pursuant to Article 35 GDPR. Furthermore, the DPA warned of the principle of transparency in relation to data subjects and their rights. That means providing them clear, accessible and understandable information regarding their personal data and the way it is processed. In this regard the controller is to take into account the functioning off the tool, and degree of human intervention throughout the process. Particularly, the controller must assess the possibility of Article 22 GDPR application and corresponding necessary limitations and safeguards.

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case PS/00009/2026 in ES

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

23 September 2026

Authority

Agencia Española de Protección de Datos

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-10322

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case PS/00009/2026 - Spain (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: