Court case 5 Sa 108/19 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA25 February 2020Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Germany ruled on a case involving a data protection officer who was removed from their position due to alleged misconduct. The court emphasized the need for data protection officers to maintain reliability and confidentiality in their roles.

What happened

The court addressed the validity of a data protection officer's removal from their position.

Who was affected

The data protection officer whose appointment was revoked by their employer.

What the authority found

The State Labour Court found that the officer's alleged misconduct raised questions about their reliability for the role.

Why this matters

This ruling highlights the importance of trust and integrity in data protection roles, reminding businesses to carefully evaluate their data protection officers.

Decision AuthorityState Labour Court Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The defendant revoked the plaintiff’s appointment as a group data protection officer due to the allegations that the plaintiff had illegally set up a pension commitment for the then commercial director in collusive cooperation and had likewise acted on his own pension promise without an effective legal basis. = TThe plaintiff took the view that the revocations of the appointment as group or data protection officer were ineffective since there was no important reason. The plaintiff argued that he had not violated his obligations as data protection officer. = The defendant argued that the plaintiff lacks the necessary reliability for the work of the data protection officer. In the defendant’s view, there was no entitlement to a company pension scheme and the plaintiff's legal opinion was not justifiable. Only the Supervisory Board was responsible for the promise of a pension. The plaintiff disregarded the objections expressed by the head of payroll accounting and two other employees. He also did not involve the defendant's supervisory board. The State Labour Court Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania had to decide, whether the plaintiff has violated any general obligations from the employment relationship that prevent further use in the role of data protection officer. The Court stated that the data protection officer must not only have the necessary specialist knowledge, but also offer the guarantee that he will carry out his duties conscientiously and not against his obligations as a data protection officer, e.g. B. violates his duty of confidentiality. A serious violation of general employment contract obligations can also jeopardize reliability, e.g. theft, embezzlement, intentional damage to reputation, assault against other employees, etc. The reliability must be assessed taking into account the purpose of the appointment of a data protection officer. The data protection officer has the task of ensuring effective self-monitoring of the data protection regulations

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 5 Sa 108/19 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

25 February 2020

Authority

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 5 Sa 108/19 - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: