Gert-Jan Dennekamp – Court Ruling (European Union, 2011)
Court ruling (pre-GDPR, Directive 95/46/EC)
This national court ruling predates the GDPR and interprets earlier data protection law. It is excluded from cookie statistics and the Risk Calculator.
Gert-Jan Dennekamp asked to see documents about the pension scheme for Members of the European Parliament, but the European Parliament denied his request. They said sharing those documents would invade the privacy of the MEPs. This ruling highlights the importance of privacy rights when it comes to personal information.
What happened
Gert-Jan Dennekamp requested access to documents related to the pension scheme for Members of the European Parliament.
Who was affected
Members of the European Parliament whose privacy would be affected by disclosing the requested documents.
What the authority found
The court ruled that Dennekamp did not provide valid reasons to override the privacy rights of the MEPs.
Why this matters
This case shows that privacy rights are taken seriously, especially for public officials. It reminds businesses to be cautious when handling sensitive personal information.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The applicant submitted an application requesting public access to all the documents concerning additional pension scheme for Members of the European Parliament. The same was rejected by the European parliament on the ground that such documents contain details regarding the private lives of MEPs and such a disclosure would violate their right to privacy and integrity and would be contrary to Article 8(b) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001. The court held that the applicant was unable to fulfill the obligation under Article 8(b) of the Regulation No 45/2001 that requires the demonstration of express and legitimate reasons for sharing the requested personal data so that the European parliament can balance the interests of the concerned parties and to determine whether the legitimate interests and the privacy of the MEPs would be violated by transferring the requested data in such a scenario.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Gert-Jan Dennekamp in EU
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Gert-Jan Dennekamp - European Union (2011). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: