Court case W256 2225038-1/8E (genealogy association) – Court Ruling (Austria, 2022)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Austrian Federal Administrative Court dismissed a genealogy association's appeal regarding a proposed family-tree database that could include living people. This ruling is significant as it reinforces the need for proper authorization when handling personal data.
What happened
The court rejected an appeal from a genealogy association seeking authorization for a public family-tree database.
Who was affected
The genealogy association was affected by the court's decision.
What the authority found
The court held that the proposed database did not meet the necessary legal requirements for authorization.
Why this matters
This ruling underscores the importance of obtaining proper authorization for projects involving personal data, especially when it concerns living individuals.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
On 17 May 2022 the Austrian Federal Administrative Court dismissed an anonymised genealogy association’s appeal against point 1 of the DSB’s authorization refusal of 23 August 2019, DSB-D202-227/0001-DSB/2019. The proposed public family-tree database could include living people. The court held that authorization under Section 7(3) DSG was not available for the proposed archival collection and provision of information for other researchers, as distinct from the applicant’s own particular research. Possible later use of existing data for its own research would require a separate legal assessment. This was a judicial review of an authorization refusal, not an administrative fine or a finding that every genealogy activity is unlawful. No monetary privacy sanction was imposed. Ordinary revision was declared inadmissible.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case W256 2225038-1/8E (genealogy association) in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W256 2225038-1/8E (genealogy association) - Austria (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: