DPA case CDP/54/2023 (organisation) – Order (Malta, 2024)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An organisation received a reprimand and an order to remove personal information from a public video, or delete the whole video if editing was impossible. The fact that court documents were public did not provide a lawful basis for republication. No fine was imposed.
What happened
The video disclosed names and identity-card numbers of 26 people and singled out three of them with additional information.
Who was affected
The respondent organisation is anonymised in the original. The data subjects were people identified in a judicial protest.
What the authority found
The Commissioner found an Article 6(1) infringement, issued a reprimand and required removal of the specified data across the controller’s platforms within 20 days of receipt, with evidence of compliance.
Why this matters
Public availability of court documents does not itself authorise unrestricted republication of personal information. A warning about future fines for non-compliance is not an imposed fine.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Review needed — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, date discrepancy, source review conflict.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
On 15 January 2024 Malta’s Information and Data Protection Commissioner issued CDP/54/2023 against an anonymised organisation that had posted a public Facebook video containing the names and identity-card numbers of 26 people from a judicial protest and additional information singling out three of them. The controller argued that the judicial protest and news reporting were already public. The Commissioner rejected public availability as a blanket permission for further disclosure and found an Article 6(1) GDPR infringement because no lawful basis for this processing had been demonstrated. The decision issued a reprimand under Article 58(2)(b) and ordered removal of all the personal information about the three singled-out people and the names and identity-card numbers from the protest. If that editing was impossible, the video had to be removed in full. The order applied to every platform on which the controller had published or shared it, with compliance and evidence required within 20 days of receipt. The reasoning also discusses accountability, Article 14(2)(f) information about data sources and national identity-number safeguards under Article 8 of Malta’s Data Protection Act; the operative infringement finding is Article 6(1). No administrative fine was imposed by this decision: a fine for future non-compliance is conditional. The exact date appears on page 1 of the original letter; neither the case-number year nor the PDF creation date is substituted. No later appeal or finality is established.
Outcome
Order
A binding order requiring the controller to take specific action.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case CDP/54/2023 (organisation) in MT
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Order Date
15 January 2024
Authority
Information and Data Protection Commissioner
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-7847About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case CDP/54/2023 (organisation) - Malta (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: