Enforcing jurisdiction
Hungary · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Deichmann Cipőkereskedelmi Korlátolt Felelősségű Társaság – €50,000 Fine (Hungary, 2020)

€50,000Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság3 September 2020Hungary
final
Fine

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Deichmann, a shoe retailer, was fined for mishandling a customer's request to access video footage of a transaction. The company failed to keep proper records of requests and did not provide the customer with the footage he requested. This case emphasizes the importance of properly handling customer data requests.

What happened

Deichmann did not allow a customer to access video footage of his transaction after he claimed he was shortchanged.

Who was affected

A customer of Deichmann who wanted to view video footage of his purchase.

What the authority found

The authority found that Deichmann violated multiple GDPR provisions related to data access requests and failed to keep proper records.

Why this matters

This fine serves as a reminder for businesses to maintain clear procedures for handling customer data requests and to ensure compliance with data protection laws.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 12(4) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR
Art. 18(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 24(1) GDPR
Art. 24(2) GDPR
Art. 25(1) GDPR
Art. 83(2) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 12(4) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR
Art. 18(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 24(1) GDPR
Art. 24(2) GDPR
Art. 25(1) GDPR
Art. 83(2) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 12 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, amount discrepancy.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A customer of the Deichmann company claimed that after an in-store purchase he did not receive the correct amount of money back from the cashier. The customer initially did not notice that he paid with a larger bill, and only later noticed and informed Deichmann. Since the facts were disputed, the customer asked the company to view the video recording in which the customer appeared as he was paying. Deichmann informed the customer that the recording can only be accessed by the police following an official request. The customer filed a police report, but the camera recording was no longer available by the time of the request. Following this situation, the NAIH conducted an ex officio investigation into the company and found that Deichmann was operating cameras extensively throughout the country, with cameras in all 129 of its stores. The DPA found that the controller had breached multiple GDPR provisions in connection to data subject access requests. Amongst these, the company did not keep separate records of the data subject requests that it had been receiving. Did the data controller fulfill its obligations under the GDPR in connection with data subject access requests? The DPA first held that the request to access the camera images does fall within the scope of Article 15(1) GDPR. Furthermore, the NAIH emphasised that the controller's claims were incorrect with regards to the footage only being accessible to the police. Apart from Article 15(3), the DPA held that the data controller must also give data subjects access to the part of the recording in which that person appears. The NAIH also pointed to the importance of Article 12(4) and offering data subjects adequate explanations on the reasons for a controller's refusal to act on a data subject's request. Regarding the deletion of the recording, the DPA held that Deichmann breached Article 18(1)(c). The controller should have kept the data following the data subject's request, until his legal claim was set

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Deichmann Cipőkereskedelmi Korlátolt Felelősségű Társaság in HU

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Fine Date

3 September 2020

Authority

Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság

Fine Amount

€50,000

20,000,000 HUF

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Deichmann Cipőkereskedelmi Korlátolt Felelősségű Társaság - Hungary (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: