Enforcing jurisdiction
Sweden · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Umeå University – €48,400 Fine (Sweden, 2020)

€48,400DPA Datainspektionen10 December 2020Sweden
final
Fine

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Umeå University was fined for sending sensitive personal data via unencrypted emails and for storing it with a US cloud provider without adequate protection. The Swedish data protection authority found that the university failed to ensure proper data security measures. This case serves as a reminder for organizations to prioritize data security, especially when handling sensitive information.

What happened

Umeå University was fined for sending sensitive personal data in unencrypted emails and inadequately protecting it when stored with a US cloud provider.

Who was affected

Victims of crimes whose sensitive personal data was included in the investigation reports handled by Umeå University.

What the authority found

The authority ruled that Umeå University breached GDPR by failing to protect sensitive personal data and not reporting a data breach in a timely manner.

Why this matters

This ruling stresses the importance of strong data security practices and timely breach reporting, especially for organizations dealing with sensitive information.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 32(2) GDPR
Art. 33(1) GDPR
Art. 33(5) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 32(2) GDPR
Art. 33(1) GDPR
Art. 33(5) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Chapter 35(1) of the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act
Chapter 11(3) of the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 12 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Two researchers from Umeå University in Sweden acquired copies of all preliminary investigation reports in Sweden for 2014 on cases of rape of male victims from the police. In July 2016, the Swedish Police Authority sent paper copies of the investigation reports to the researchers by mail carrier. In November 2017, the researchers contacted Swedish Police Authority and asked for additional information about one of the cases. The researchers attached a scanned copy of one of the investigations to an email sent unencrypted. When the Swedish Police Authority pointed out the inappropriateness of sending sensitive material via unencrypted emails, the researchers claimed it was an unintentional act and blamed the human factor. In February 2019, the research team wanted more information on the same rape case and sent the same investigation report again in an unencrypted email to the Swedish Police Authority. The researchers also claimed the second email to be an accident. After this incident the Swedish Police Authority wrote an official letter dated April 3, 2019, which was sent to the Swedish DPA (Datainspektionen). The DPA launched an investigation to determine whether Umeå University had breached the GDPR. The preliminary investigatory reports contain special categories of personal data such as data about health and sex life and information about suspected offences. They also contain names, contact details and personal numbers of victims and suspects. The research team changed their routines after the first unencrypted email, but could not explain why they then sent the same report a second time in an unencrypted email In September 2019, Umeå University analyzed the data breach and found that it did not pose a high risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects. As the email was addressed to a staff member at Swedish Police Authority who provided the researchers with the reports, the university concluded that there was no evidence of actual harm or unauthorized disclosure. The university also scanned 108 preliminary investigation reports and uploaded them to the cloud storage provider Box. Box is a US-based cloud provider and was a sub-processor of the processor The Swedish University computer Network. Box Transferred personal data to the US on the basis of the Privacy Shield (in force at the time) and binding corporate rules. The files were confidential under [https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/offentlighets--och-sekretesslag-2009400_sfs-2009-400#K35P1 Chapter 35(1)] and [https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/offentlighets--och-sekretesslag-2009400_sfs-2009-400#K11P3 Chapter 11(3)] of The Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act ([https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/offentlighets--och-sekretesslag-2009400_sfs-2009-400 Offentlighets- och sekretesslagen]). The researchers stored the files in a folder in Box that was accessible only to the two researchers. The information was protected by 256-bit SSL encryption in transit and 256-bit encryption at rest. Encryption keys were kept separate from the data, and backups were also encrypted. Access to files was protected by single-factor authentication (username and password). In 2016, the University considered that Box met the legal and technical requirements for storing sensitive personal data. Nevertheless, the University considered that such data should not be stored in Box as a precautionary measure. = The DPA found that the University had breached Article 5(1)(f), Article 32(1) and Article 32(2) by failing to adequately protect the personal data in the reports. Although the emails were sent to the correct person at The Swedish Police Authority, they were sent unencrypted over the internet. The DPA recalled that the Internet is an open network and that unauthorized persons may gain access to information sent over such a network if it is not adequately protected, for example by encryption. = The DPA found that the University violated Article 33(1) and Article 33(5) by failing to timely document and report a data breach. According to the DPA, the university became aware of the data breach at the time the Swedish Police Authority told the researchers that it was inappropriate to send criminal investigations in unencrypted emails. According to the DPA, the university knew about the incident on at least April 3, 2019, not August 30, 2019, when it received the letter from the DPA informing it that it was under investigation. = The DPA found that the University breached Article 5(1)(f), Article 32(1) and Article 32(2) by storing the 108 preliminary investigation reports with the cloud provider Box. First of all, the University did not take sufficient technical measures with regard to the sensitivity of personal data. Although the data was encrypted in Box, anyone from any IP address could access the data if they had the correct username and password. The DPA recalled that one-factor authentication is vulnerable to phishing attacks and that it would be unlikely for the researchers to know if their username and password were in the wrong hands. The DPA held that sensitive personal data of this nature must be protected by multi-factor authentication. The DPA reminded that a data controller must carry out a risk assessment and determine whether it is appropriate to store certain personal data with a particular processor. The assessment should be made in relation to the risk of unauthorized disclosure or access. The DPA concluded that the preliminary investigative reports concerned rapes against men and contained sensitive personal data that was classified. The DPA considered that the data processing posed a high risk to the privacy of the data subjects if the information was disclosed to or accessed by unauthorized persons. In addition, the DPA considered that the transfer of the personal data to the United States was problematic as the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act does not apply in the US. = The DPA imposed a sanction fee of SEK 550 000 on Umeå University. SEK 450 000 related to the unencrypted emails and the storage of the preliminary investigation reports with a US cloud provider, SEK 100 000 related to the failure to document and report the data breach in a timely manner. The DPA deemed the violations in the unencrypted sending of emails and storage of the reports at the US cloud provider, as negligently caused. In this case, 108 criminal investigation reports containing highly sensitive personal data were stored with the US cloud provider without adequate data protection. On top of that, the university had stored the sensitive personal data in Box even though its own risk and vulnerability assessment concluded that such data should not be stored there.

Details

Fine Date

10 December 2020

Authority

DPA Datainspektionen

Fine Amount

€48,400

550,000 SEK

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-3011

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Umeå University - Sweden (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: