OÜ Laidoneri KV – Violation Found (Estonia, 2022)

Violation Found
Andmekaitse Inspektsioon6 December 2022Estonia
final
Violation Found

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Estonia's data protection authority found that a hotel used CCTV cameras to monitor employees without a proper legal basis. The hotel claimed it had consent through signs, but the signs lacked necessary information. This case highlights the need for clear communication about surveillance practices.

What happened

OÜ Laidoneri KV used CCTV cameras to monitor hotel employees without a valid legal basis.

Who was affected

Hotel employees who were monitored by the CCTV cameras.

What the authority found

The Estonian DPA ruled that the hotel lacked a valid legal basis for using CCTV cameras, as the consent signs were inadequate.

Why this matters

This decision emphasizes the importance of providing clear and complete information when using surveillance systems. Businesses should ensure their surveillance practices comply with privacy laws and clearly communicate their purpose to employees.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 5 GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A hotel company, OÜ Laidoneri KV (the controller), installed CCTV cameras visible in three external corners of its Park Hotel Viljandi, the public spaces on the ground floor as well as in the kitchen and the basement floor. The cameras monitored the employees of the hotel (data subjects). On its own initiative, the Estonian DPA started an investigation with the aim of finding out on what legal basis and for what purpose the CCTV cameras were used. During the proceedings, the controller explained that it used consent as a legal basis through the installation of information signs on the walls of the building, notifying data subjects that surveillance camera were active. First, the DPA recalled that according to Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, personal data processing must have a valid legal basis under Article 6(1) GDPR. As a general rule, the processing of personal data in an employment relationship can be lawful if it is related to the performance of a contractual obligation or a legal duty owed to the employer, or if it is in the legitimate interest of the employer or a third party. In the present case, the DPA stated that the fulfilment of contractual obligations can only be invoked for processing operations which are actually necessary for the employer to perform the employment contract, which the use of cameras certainly was not. The DPA also rejected the argument of the controller that the processing of personal data could be based on Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. The investigation revealed that the signs informing about the usage of CCTV cameras were not suitable as they lacked necessary information about the aim of the video surveillance, no legal basis was mentioned, and no information was provided about the controller. Therefore, the only possible legal basis would be legitimate interest under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. However, in order to invoke this legal basis, an assessment must be carried out, showing that the interest of the controller outweighs the interests, fund

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for OÜ Laidoneri KV in EE

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

6 December 2022

Authority

Andmekaitse Inspektsioon

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5562

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. OÜ Laidoneri KV - Estonia (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: