Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Federal Minister of Finances – Violation Found (Austria, 2022)

Violation Found
Datenschutzbehörde14 February 2022Austria
final
Violation Found

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Austrian DPA found that the Federal Minister of Finances did not comply with data protection rules regarding the disclosure of information in a corruption inquiry. The authority ruled that the Minister's actions were subject to GDPR oversight, despite his claims of legislative immunity. This case illustrates the complexities of data protection responsibilities in government actions.

What happened

The Federal Minister of Finances attempted to prevent the disclosure of information related to a corruption inquiry, claiming GDPR did not apply.

Who was affected

An Austrian politician whose personal data was involved in a corruption inquiry.

What the authority found

The Austrian DPA ruled that the Federal Minister of Finances is subject to GDPR, rejecting claims of legislative immunity.

Why this matters

This case shows that even government officials must adhere to data protection laws. It highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in handling personal data in public inquiries.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 2(2)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 2(2)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(f) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 19 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 16 December 2021, the corruption inquiry committee ordered the Minister of Finances as a controller to disclose information regarding potential criminal financial proceedings initiated against an Austrian politician, as data subject. On 24 January 2022, in an attempt to prevent such disclosure from happening, the data subject requested the Austrian DPA to issue a ban on the processing pursuant to Article 58(2)(f) GDPR. The data subject stated that the issue therein lay not in the transmission of information itself, but rather in the inquiry’s lack of confidentiality, citing past leaks to the media. Moreover, the data subject noted an absence of a legal basis for the processing of his personal data, claiming that this would constitute a violation against Article 5 GDPR and Article 6 GDPR. The Federal Minister of Finances denied the competence of the DPA, relying on recent decisions stating that the GDPR does not cover core legislative activities as provided for in Article 2(2)(a) GDPR. He argued that in this case he did not act in his role as part of the executive branch, but rather on behalf of the legislative branch, acting as an auxiliary body thereof and being subject to submission to the parliament’s inquiry committee. Furthermore, the Federal Minister of Finances pointed out that the threat to confidentiality interests worthy of protection would arise only, if at all, in the sphere of the inquiry committee in parliament. The DPA denied the Federal Minister of Finances’ claim to function solely on behalf of the legislative branch, as he is not obliged to submit to the inquiry commission in every case and thus retains his function as an organ of the executive branch. As a consequence, the DPA asserted to have the general competence of reviewing the actions of the Federal Minister of Finances under the GDPR. However, the DPA nevertheless rejected the data subject’s request, stating that its role is limited to ex-post control. The DPA held that ex-ante control

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Federal Minister of Finances in AT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

14 February 2022

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Federal Minister of Finances - Austria (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: